Global evidence on nature-positive agricultural practices and their socio-economic and ecological impacts: a systematic review

Background Nature Positive Food Production (NPFP) is an emerging framework for linking agricultural productivity with the regeneration of ecosystems. It works toward the restoration of soil health, improvement in biodiversity, and strengthening climate resilience of global food systems. Yet, evidence regarding how NPFP practices perform under a wide range of ecological and socio-economic contexts remains fragmented. Methodology This review synthesizes the evidence of nature-positive agricultural practices globally through a PRISMA framing. Searches in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar include policy and grey literature relevant to the review published between 2010 and 2025. Eligible studies assessed agricultural approaches that presented quantifiable ecological restoration or sustainability outcomes. Of these, 45 studies were included and assessed for methodological quality using the adapted MMAT. Results Variations in the ecological and economic benefits exist for different types of farming, including regenerative agriculture, agroecology, agroforestry, climate-smart agriculture, and integrated pest management. This ranges from 15 to 30% increases in soil organic carbon, 20–50% improvements in on-farm biodiversity, and 10–25% improved yield stability relative to conventional approaches. Policies that promote coherence, agricultural investments, and inclusive financing channels have been widely recognized to enable scaling up nature-positive changes, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Conclusion Nature-positive food production is the science-based pathway to bring ecosystems back to life in a way that secures safe, healthy, and sustainable food supplies. If this approach is to be scaled up globally, then good governance, fair finance, and knowledge platforms will be required that connect ecological regeneration with productivity and resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1723693
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global evidence on nature-positive agricultural practices and their socio-economic and ecological impacts: a systematic review

Gregory Ngmensoa, Joseph Amoah
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
article

Global evidence on nature-positive agricultural practices and their socio-economic and ecological impacts: a systematic review

Gregory Ngmensoa, Joseph Amoah
article en

Abstract

Background Nature Positive Food Production (NPFP) is an emerging framework for linking agricultural productivity with the regeneration of ecosystems. It works toward the restoration of soil health, improvement in biodiversity, and strengthening climate resilience of global food systems. Yet, evidence regarding how NPFP practices perform under a wide range of ecological and socio-economic contexts remains fragmented. Methodology This review synthesizes the evidence of nature-positive agricultural practices globally through a PRISMA framing. Searches in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar include policy and grey literature relevant to the review published between 2010 and 2025. Eligible studies assessed agricultural approaches that presented quantifiable ecological restoration or sustainability outcomes. Of these, 45 studies were included and assessed for methodological quality using the adapted MMAT. Results Variations in the ecological and economic benefits exist for different types of farming, including regenerative agriculture, agroecology, agroforestry, climate-smart agriculture, and integrated pest management. This ranges from 15 to 30% increases in soil organic carbon, 20–50% improvements in on-farm biodiversity, and 10–25% improved yield stability relative to conventional approaches. Policies that promote coherence, agricultural investments, and inclusive financing channels have been widely recognized to enable scaling up nature-positive changes, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Conclusion Nature-positive food production is the science-based pathway to bring ecosystems back to life in a way that secures safe, healthy, and sustainable food supplies. If this approach is to be scaled up globally, then good governance, fair finance, and knowledge platforms will be required that connect ecological regeneration with productivity and resilience.

Frontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsVol. 9
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.