Coffee yield is influenced by soil properties, not by nitrogen fertilization strategies, under greenhouse gas monitoring in a Costa Rican Andisol

In recent years, Costa Rican coffee farms have increased nitrogen (N) inputs to maximize yields, using different rates, timings, and sources. N is often applied in complete fertilizers that include phosphorus (P), a limiting nutrient in Andisols due to their physical and chemical properties. However, excessive N use raises concerns about greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and soil acidification. In 2024, a field trial was conducted for eight months at the Alsacia Coffee Farm (Starbucks Company) in Alajuela, Costa Rica, to evaluate coffee yield and quantify nitrous oxide (N 2 O) and methane (CH 4 ) emissions under three N fertilization strategies, considering soil interactions. The experiment used 15 × 16 m plots in six randomized complete blocks across two sectors (A and B) with contrasting microtopography. Treatments included: urea (U; 414 kg N ha - ¹, split into two applications), urea + urease inhibitor NBPT (F; 346 kg N ha - ¹), and ammonium nitrate (Y; 346 kg N ha - ¹), the last two split into three applications. No significant yield differences were observed during one crop cycle among treatments; however, yield was strongly affected by soil properties. Sector A, with 50% more clay and higher P, doubled the yield compared to Sector B. N 2 O cumulative emissions were similar for F and Y but higher in U due to greater N input. Soils acted as a CH 4 sink. Although treatment F had lower yield-scaled emissions (74 ± 20 g CO 2 e kg coffee - ¹ ) than U (146 ± 47 g CO 2 e kg coffee - ¹ ), the environmental impact was limited. Results highlight the importance of site-specific nutrient and soil management to improve sustainability in coffee production. Under the experimental conditions, soil texture and phosphorus content were key factors influencing coffee productivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Agronomy
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2025.1729122
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Coffee research and impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coffee yield is influenced by soil properties, not by nitrogen fertilization strategies, under greenhouse gas monitoring in a Costa Rican Andisol

Ana Gabriela Pérez-Castillo, Weynner Giraldo-Sanclemente, Marcelo Elizondo-Barquero, Carlos Mario Rodríguez-Solís
1 citations
Frontiers in Agronomy
Coffee research and impacts
1.39
article

Coffee yield is influenced by soil properties, not by nitrogen fertilization strategies, under greenhouse gas monitoring in a Costa Rican Andisol

Ana Gabriela Pérez-Castillo, Weynner Giraldo-Sanclemente, Marcelo Elizondo-Barquero, Carlos Mario Rodríguez-Solís
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In recent years, Costa Rican coffee farms have increased nitrogen (N) inputs to maximize yields, using different rates, timings, and sources. N is often applied in complete fertilizers that include phosphorus (P), a limiting nutrient in Andisols due to their physical and chemical properties. However, excessive N use raises concerns about greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and soil acidification. In 2024, a field trial was conducted for eight months at the Alsacia Coffee Farm (Starbucks Company) in Alajuela, Costa Rica, to evaluate coffee yield and quantify nitrous oxide (N 2 O) and methane (CH 4 ) emissions under three N fertilization strategies, considering soil interactions. The experiment used 15 × 16 m plots in six randomized complete blocks across two sectors (A and B) with contrasting microtopography. Treatments included: urea (U; 414 kg N ha - ¹, split into two applications), urea + urease inhibitor NBPT (F; 346 kg N ha - ¹), and ammonium nitrate (Y; 346 kg N ha - ¹), the last two split into three applications. No significant yield differences were observed during one crop cycle among treatments; however, yield was strongly affected by soil properties. Sector A, with 50% more clay and higher P, doubled the yield compared to Sector B. N 2 O cumulative emissions were similar for F and Y but higher in U due to greater N input. Soils acted as a CH 4 sink. Although treatment F had lower yield-scaled emissions (74 ± 20 g CO 2 e kg coffee - ¹ ) than U (146 ± 47 g CO 2 e kg coffee - ¹ ), the environmental impact was limited. Results highlight the importance of site-specific nutrient and soil management to improve sustainability in coffee production. Under the experimental conditions, soil texture and phosphorus content were key factors influencing coffee productivity.

Frontiers in AgronomyVol. 7
Universidad de Costa Rica (CR), Instituto Centroamericano de Administración de Empresas (CR)
Universidad de Costa Rica
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Coffee research and impacts
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.