Individual- and area-level socioeconomic inequalities in cancer incidence in the working-age population – a cohort study based on German statutory health insurance data, 2015 to 2019

Our findings suggest that strategies to prevent cancer in the working-age population should take more account of the unequal structural conditions in which people work and live. The study shows that area-level socioeconomic deprivation has explanatory power for unequal cancer risks beyond the individual characteristics of socioeconomic position.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-25890-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health and Medical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Individual- and area-level socioeconomic inequalities in cancer incidence in the working-age population – a cohort study based on German statutory health insurance data, 2015 to 2019

Simon Brinkwirth, Benjamin Wachtler, Fabian Tetzlaff, Jens Hoebel et al.
1 citations
BMC Public Health
Health and Medical Studies
2.82
article

Individual- and area-level socioeconomic inequalities in cancer incidence in the working-age population – a cohort study based on German statutory health insurance data, 2015 to 2019

Simon Brinkwirth, Benjamin Wachtler, Fabian Tetzlaff, Jens Hoebel, Juliane Tetzlaff, Marco Alibone, Anja Cengia
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Our findings suggest that strategies to prevent cancer in the working-age population should take more account of the unequal structural conditions in which people work and live. The study shows that area-level socioeconomic deprivation has explanatory power for unequal cancer risks beyond the individual characteristics of socioeconomic position.

BMC Public HealthVol. 26(1)
Robert Koch Institute (DE), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), Institute for Applied Economic Research (DE), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Health and Medical Studies
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.