Responsibility in the Field of Artificial Intelligence Systems Usage: Features of Private and Public Law Regulation

The article examines the approaches and specifics of legal responsibility in the context of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, focusing particularly on private and public law. The study aims to analyze current legal mechanisms for responsible use of AI systems, with a particular emphasis on BRICS and the European Union jurisdictions, in order to identify effective regulatory approaches for AI activities. The paper also discusses ethical and ‘soft’ regulatory mechanisms for AI applications. Special attention is given to international recommendations on AI governance and harmonization of transparency and accountability standards on a global scale. The authors highlight the significant initiatives of private law, driven by the active integration of AI into private economic sectors, as well as the flexibility of companies in developing internal standards and ethical codes. In conclusion, the article emphasizes the need for integrating private and public responsibility mechanisms, and harmonizing international standards to ensure the effective protection of citizens’ rights while fostering innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BRICS Law Journal
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2025-12-4-147-166
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responsibility in the Field of Artificial Intelligence Systems Usage: Features of Private and Public Law Regulation

Nikolay Kalashnikov, I. R. Khmelevskoi
BRICS Law Journal
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Responsibility in the Field of Artificial Intelligence Systems Usage: Features of Private and Public Law Regulation

Nikolay Kalashnikov, I. R. Khmelevskoi
article en

Abstract

The article examines the approaches and specifics of legal responsibility in the context of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, focusing particularly on private and public law. The study aims to analyze current legal mechanisms for responsible use of AI systems, with a particular emphasis on BRICS and the European Union jurisdictions, in order to identify effective regulatory approaches for AI activities. The paper also discusses ethical and ‘soft’ regulatory mechanisms for AI applications. Special attention is given to international recommendations on AI governance and harmonization of transparency and accountability standards on a global scale. The authors highlight the significant initiatives of private law, driven by the active integration of AI into private economic sectors, as well as the flexibility of companies in developing internal standards and ethical codes. In conclusion, the article emphasizes the need for integrating private and public responsibility mechanisms, and harmonizing international standards to ensure the effective protection of citizens’ rights while fostering innovation.

BRICS Law JournalVol. 12(4)
University of Tyumen (RU), Industrial University of Tyumen (RU)
Russian Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Responsibility in the Field of Artificial Intelligence Systems Usage: Features of Private and Public Law Regulation — Nikolay Kalashnikov, I. R. Khmelevskoi · BRICS Law Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS