Dramatic increases in redundant publications in the Generative AI era
The rapid growth in redundant publications (a 17-fold increase between 2022 and 2024) suggests a systemic failure of editorial checks. These papers distort meta-analyses and scientometric studies, waste scarce peer review resources, and pose a significant threat to the integrity of the scientific record. Current checks for redundant publications and plagiarism are no longer fit for purpose in the GenAI era; greater co-operation between publishers and modified guidelines will be needed to address new innovations in paper mill production.
Authors
- Matt Spick (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9417-6511)
- Adrian Gerard Barnett (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6339-0374)
- Danny Maupin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0510-6627)
- Tulsi Suchak
Institutions
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- University of Surrey (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Medicine
- Published
- 2025-12-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04569-y
- Citations
- 7
- Primary Topic
- Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 29.18