Do Research Attitudes Predict Participation? A Quantitative Analysis Using the Research Attitudes Questionnaire

This study aimed to examine whether positive attitudes toward research predict actual participation behaviour in online research settings. The Research Attitudes Questionnaire (RAQ) was used to assess individuals’ beliefs about research, while verified participation records from the Prolific platform served as the behavioural outcome measure.A total of 215 participants completed the seven-item RAQ and provided consent for their verified participation data to be accessed through the Prolific platform. A simple linear regression analysis was conducted, with RAQ scores as the predictor variable and the total number of completed studies as the outcome variable. Participants reported generally favourable attitudes toward research; however, RAQ scores did not significantly predict verified participation behaviour (β = .071, p = .28). Attitudes accounted for only a small proportion of the variance in participation (R² = .005), suggesting limited predictive power. These findings highlight a disconnect between attitudinal endorsement and actual behaviour, consistent with the intention-behaviour gap described by Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behaviour. The results underscore the limitations of using attitudinal measures alone to predict research engagement and suggest that integrative models incorporating individual, contextual, and structural factors are needed to improve participation rates, particularly in online contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Educational Health and Community Psychology
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12928/jehcp.vi.31088
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Research Attitudes Predict Participation? A Quantitative Analysis Using the Research Attitudes Questionnaire

Prince Kouassi
Journal of Educational Health and Community Psychology
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Do Research Attitudes Predict Participation? A Quantitative Analysis Using the Research Attitudes Questionnaire

Prince Kouassi
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to examine whether positive attitudes toward research predict actual participation behaviour in online research settings. The Research Attitudes Questionnaire (RAQ) was used to assess individuals’ beliefs about research, while verified participation records from the Prolific platform served as the behavioural outcome measure.A total of 215 participants completed the seven-item RAQ and provided consent for their verified participation data to be accessed through the Prolific platform. A simple linear regression analysis was conducted, with RAQ scores as the predictor variable and the total number of completed studies as the outcome variable. Participants reported generally favourable attitudes toward research; however, RAQ scores did not significantly predict verified participation behaviour (β = .071, p = .28). Attitudes accounted for only a small proportion of the variance in participation (R² = .005), suggesting limited predictive power. These findings highlight a disconnect between attitudinal endorsement and actual behaviour, consistent with the intention-behaviour gap described by Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behaviour. The results underscore the limitations of using attitudinal measures alone to predict research engagement and suggest that integrative models incorporating individual, contextual, and structural factors are needed to improve participation rates, particularly in online contexts.

Journal of Educational Health and Community Psychology
American University in Dubai (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.