Deep learning-based volumetry of the future liver remnants and prediction of candidates for major hepatectomy

To develop and validate a deep learning-based future liver remnant (FLR) volumetry system (DL-FLRVS) by secondary utilization of existing preoperative CT images, and to compare the differences between the currently used method and DL-FLRVS in volumetry of FLR and the application in candidate categorization before major hepatectomy. DL-FLRVS, which consists of five 3D U-Net models for the automated segmentation of liver anatomy on contrast-enhanced CT, was developed (n = 307, 170, 170, 170, and 492, respectively) and validated (n = 178) in external validation cohorts. The FLR and FLR% of patients were measured using DL-FLRVS and the hepatic VCAR (i.e., a semi-automated segmentation program on a dedicated workstation) for different types of major hepatectomy. Manual measurements were used as a reference. The differences in FLR assessment and candidate categorization between the two methods were compared using Spearman analysis and McNemar’s test, respectively. The mean FLR and FLR% values were (493.51 ± 284.77) cm3 and (38.53 ± 19.38) %, respectively, when DL-FLRVS was used, (489.23 ± 286.29) cm3 and (37.77 ± 19.12) %, when the hepatic VCAR was used. No significant differences in the categorization of candidates for major hepatectomy were found between the DL-FLRVS and human doctors (P > 0.99 and P > 0.99, respectively) or between the hepatic VCAR and human doctors (P > 0.99 and P = 0.07, respectively). DL-FLRVS represents a potential alternative to the currently used method in volumetry of FLR and FLR-based candidate categorization in major hepatectomy in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Imaging
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-02106-0
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep learning-based volumetry of the future liver remnants and prediction of candidates for major hepatectomy

Tingting Xie, Kun Ma, E Tuya, Taomei Zhu et al.
BMC Medical Imaging
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Deep learning-based volumetry of the future liver remnants and prediction of candidates for major hepatectomy

Tingting Xie, Kun Ma, E Tuya, Taomei Zhu, Zichun Hua, Demin Xu, Yongbin Li, Huiming Shan, Guanxun Cheng, Ziwei Liu, Zhengwei Li, Jingyu Zhou, Yaofeng Zhang, Xiaoying Wang
article en

Abstract

To develop and validate a deep learning-based future liver remnant (FLR) volumetry system (DL-FLRVS) by secondary utilization of existing preoperative CT images, and to compare the differences between the currently used method and DL-FLRVS in volumetry of FLR and the application in candidate categorization before major hepatectomy. DL-FLRVS, which consists of five 3D U-Net models for the automated segmentation of liver anatomy on contrast-enhanced CT, was developed (n = 307, 170, 170, 170, and 492, respectively) and validated (n = 178) in external validation cohorts. The FLR and FLR% of patients were measured using DL-FLRVS and the hepatic VCAR (i.e., a semi-automated segmentation program on a dedicated workstation) for different types of major hepatectomy. Manual measurements were used as a reference. The differences in FLR assessment and candidate categorization between the two methods were compared using Spearman analysis and McNemar’s test, respectively. The mean FLR and FLR% values were (493.51 ± 284.77) cm3 and (38.53 ± 19.38) %, respectively, when DL-FLRVS was used, (489.23 ± 286.29) cm3 and (37.77 ± 19.12) %, when the hepatic VCAR was used. No significant differences in the categorization of candidates for major hepatectomy were found between the DL-FLRVS and human doctors (P > 0.99 and P > 0.99, respectively) or between the hepatic VCAR and human doctors (P > 0.99 and P = 0.07, respectively). DL-FLRVS represents a potential alternative to the currently used method in volumetry of FLR and FLR-based candidate categorization in major hepatectomy in clinical practice.

BMC Medical ImagingVol. 26(1)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking University (CN), National Cancer Center (US), Key Laboratory of Guangdong Province (CN), BOE Technology Group (China) (CN), Guangdong Academy of Sciences (CN), Peking University Shenzhen Hospital (CN), Peking University First Hospital (CN), Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences (CN), Department of Health of Guangdong Province (CN), Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (CN), Southern Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.