Policy Lessons From the Load Capacity Curve: <scp>ESG</scp> and Economic Strategies for Sustainable <scp>OECD</scp> Futures

ABSTRACT This paper is an analysis of the environmental, social, governance, and economic factors (ESG‐ECF) and the environmental quality measured by the Load Capacity Factor (LCF) in 30 OECD countries in the years between 2000 and 2024. The analysis is based on the Method of Moments Quantile Regression (MMQR) that captures the heterogeneous effects of the LCF distribution and solves endogeneity and nonlinearity. To determine the validity of the hypothesis of the Load Capacity Curve (LCC), the squared income term is added. Although the LCC frameworks have been previously examined, the originality of the presented research is that the ESG dimensions are incorporated into the quantile‐based model of environmental performance, providing a more detailed expression of the way these elements interact at the various levels of ecological capacity. The empirical evidence is in agreement with the fact that the environmental pressures (ENF) have a significant negative impact on LCF at all quantiles, as evidenced by consistent empirical evidence. The only factor that has a positive influence is governance (GOF) in countries that perform well, and social (SOF) and economic (ECF) factors are not statistically significant overall. The LCC hypothesis is rejected because the coefficients of the economic growth and its squared value are non‐significant, which shows the absence of a nonlinear relation with environmental quality. The validity of these results is confirmed by robustness checks on system GMM based on two‐step systems. These findings imply that the policy interventions in OECD countries ought to concentrate more on reducing the amount of direct environmental stress by the use of interventions like management of water resources, forest conservation, and uptake of renewable energy. In countries that already have greater sustainability, institutional strengthening is an important consideration. The results highlight that a combination approach to ESG policies should be used to attain long‐term environmental objectives, although environmental governance and regulation hold the main position.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70518
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy Lessons From the Load Capacity Curve: ESG and Economic Strategies for Sustainable OECD Futures

A. S. Jones, Abdullah A. Aljughaiman, Usman Mehmood, Abdulateif A. Almulhim et al.
Sustainable Development
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Policy Lessons From the Load Capacity Curve: ESG and Economic Strategies for Sustainable OECD Futures

A. S. Jones, Abdullah A. Aljughaiman, Usman Mehmood, Abdulateif A. Almulhim, Enyang Zhu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper is an analysis of the environmental, social, governance, and economic factors (ESG‐ECF) and the environmental quality measured by the Load Capacity Factor (LCF) in 30 OECD countries in the years between 2000 and 2024. The analysis is based on the Method of Moments Quantile Regression (MMQR) that captures the heterogeneous effects of the LCF distribution and solves endogeneity and nonlinearity. To determine the validity of the hypothesis of the Load Capacity Curve (LCC), the squared income term is added. Although the LCC frameworks have been previously examined, the originality of the presented research is that the ESG dimensions are incorporated into the quantile‐based model of environmental performance, providing a more detailed expression of the way these elements interact at the various levels of ecological capacity. The empirical evidence is in agreement with the fact that the environmental pressures (ENF) have a significant negative impact on LCF at all quantiles, as evidenced by consistent empirical evidence. The only factor that has a positive influence is governance (GOF) in countries that perform well, and social (SOF) and economic (ECF) factors are not statistically significant overall. The LCC hypothesis is rejected because the coefficients of the economic growth and its squared value are non‐significant, which shows the absence of a nonlinear relation with environmental quality. The validity of these results is confirmed by robustness checks on system GMM based on two‐step systems. These findings imply that the policy interventions in OECD countries ought to concentrate more on reducing the amount of direct environmental stress by the use of interventions like management of water resources, forest conservation, and uptake of renewable energy. In countries that already have greater sustainability, institutional strengthening is an important consideration. The results highlight that a combination approach to ESG policies should be used to attain long‐term environmental objectives, although environmental governance and regulation hold the main position.

Sustainable Development
Richmond, The American International University in London (GB), King Faisal University (SA), Dalian Minzu University (CN), Sunway University (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.