Temporary versus permanent crating: free movement of mother sow enhances piglet play behaviour

Farrowing crates drastically restrict behavioural opportunities for lactating sows. Temporary crating (TC) systems restrain the sow for the first few days after farrowing and then allow free sow movement in the farrowing pen for the rest of lactation. TC housing systems are promoted because they improve sow welfare in comparison with permanent crating (PC) systems that restrict the sow for the whole lactation. How TC affects piglet welfare is less well understood, as it may be associated with higher mortality by crushing but also with increased positive piglet behaviours. Specifically, it has not yet been investigated whether the free movement of the mother sow, all other things being equal, influences the play behaviour of her piglets. This study compared play behaviour in 10 litters housed in PC pens with 10 litters housed in TC pens shortly after the crate removal (Days 3-6 postpartum, Period 1) and then during the 4th week of lactation (Days 18-27 postpartum, Period 2). The only difference between the two treatments was the free sow movement in TC while all other parameters of the two housing systems (e.g., pen area, floor quality, bedding) were equal. Total play behaviour, piglet-piglet social play and piglet-sow play were substantially more frequent in the TC system in both Period 1 and Period 2. This is the first study to show that giving the sow the freedom of movement within a farrowing pen early in lactation promotes piglet play behaviour. Thus, temporary crating is superior to permanent crating not only in relation to sow welfare but also when it comes to aspects of piglet welfare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
animal
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2025.101734
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporary versus permanent crating: free movement of mother sow enhances piglet play behaviour

Marek Špinka, Gudrun Illmann, V. Sekyrová, Š. Hulmáková et al.
animal
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
article

Temporary versus permanent crating: free movement of mother sow enhances piglet play behaviour

Marek Špinka, Gudrun Illmann, V. Sekyrová, Š. Hulmáková, A. Bennettová
article en

Abstract

Farrowing crates drastically restrict behavioural opportunities for lactating sows. Temporary crating (TC) systems restrain the sow for the first few days after farrowing and then allow free sow movement in the farrowing pen for the rest of lactation. TC housing systems are promoted because they improve sow welfare in comparison with permanent crating (PC) systems that restrict the sow for the whole lactation. How TC affects piglet welfare is less well understood, as it may be associated with higher mortality by crushing but also with increased positive piglet behaviours. Specifically, it has not yet been investigated whether the free movement of the mother sow, all other things being equal, influences the play behaviour of her piglets. This study compared play behaviour in 10 litters housed in PC pens with 10 litters housed in TC pens shortly after the crate removal (Days 3-6 postpartum, Period 1) and then during the 4th week of lactation (Days 18-27 postpartum, Period 2). The only difference between the two treatments was the free sow movement in TC while all other parameters of the two housing systems (e.g., pen area, floor quality, bedding) were equal. Total play behaviour, piglet-piglet social play and piglet-sow play were substantially more frequent in the TC system in both Period 1 and Period 2. This is the first study to show that giving the sow the freedom of movement within a farrowing pen early in lactation promotes piglet play behaviour. Thus, temporary crating is superior to permanent crating not only in relation to sow welfare but also when it comes to aspects of piglet welfare.

animalVol. 20(1)
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.