Being Mindful About Overuse of Total Scores: a Comparison of Total Scores and Moderated Nonlinear Factor Analysis Scores in Assessing Mindfulness Across Race/Ethnicity, Age, and PTSD Diagnosis

Although mindfulness-based interventions show initial positive results on a range of substance use behaviors, evaluations of mindfulness-based interventions would benefit from state-of-the-art alternative approaches to the ubiquitous use of sum or total scores. Sum scores do not reflect "true" underlying mindfulness as they do not consider differences in the relative weight of each item and/or the possibility that measurement may differ across groups. The purpose of this study was to identify measurement noninvariance/differential item functioning (MNI/DIF) across racial and ethnic groups, age groups, and those with PTSD diagnoses and differences in inferences on the factors of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire between scale scores estimated using moderated nonlinear factor analysis (MNLFA) and a total score analog model (TSA). Age, PTSD diagnosis, non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity, Hispanic race/ethnicity, and other race/ethnicity showed statistically significant MNI/DIF. In the MNLFA model, PTSD diagnosis and Hispanic race/ethnicity contributed to significant MNI/DIF on the "true" acting with awareness, describing, and observing latent factors such that Hispanic participants were higher on average on acting with awareness scores and lower on average on describing and observing scores. The TSA model failed to estimate significant differences on acting with awareness score for participants with PTSD diagnosis. Additionally, in the TSA model, there was an increase in the effect size of Hispanic participants' baseline describing and observing estimates, thus overestimating differences in respective scores for Hispanic participants. Failing to correct for MNI/DIF in mindfulness scale scores can impact inferences and effect sizes for group differences in mindfulness thus creating bias in characterizing mindfulness, particularly for Hispanic individuals and those with PTSD diagnoses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prevention Science
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01862-3
Primary Topic
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Being Mindful About Overuse of Total Scores: a Comparison of Total Scores and Moderated Nonlinear Factor Analysis Scores in Assessing Mindfulness Across Race/Ethnicity, Age, and PTSD Diagnosis

Mariana Sánchez, Lissette M. Saavedra, Alyssa Lozano, Tara G. Bautista et al.
Prevention Science
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
article

Being Mindful About Overuse of Total Scores: a Comparison of Total Scores and Moderated Nonlinear Factor Analysis Scores in Assessing Mindfulness Across Race/Ethnicity, Age, and PTSD Diagnosis

Mariana Sánchez, Lissette M. Saavedra, Alyssa Lozano, Tara G. Bautista, Antonio A. Morgan‐López, Hortensia Amaro
article en

Abstract

Although mindfulness-based interventions show initial positive results on a range of substance use behaviors, evaluations of mindfulness-based interventions would benefit from state-of-the-art alternative approaches to the ubiquitous use of sum or total scores. Sum scores do not reflect "true" underlying mindfulness as they do not consider differences in the relative weight of each item and/or the possibility that measurement may differ across groups. The purpose of this study was to identify measurement noninvariance/differential item functioning (MNI/DIF) across racial and ethnic groups, age groups, and those with PTSD diagnoses and differences in inferences on the factors of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire between scale scores estimated using moderated nonlinear factor analysis (MNLFA) and a total score analog model (TSA). Age, PTSD diagnosis, non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity, Hispanic race/ethnicity, and other race/ethnicity showed statistically significant MNI/DIF. In the MNLFA model, PTSD diagnosis and Hispanic race/ethnicity contributed to significant MNI/DIF on the "true" acting with awareness, describing, and observing latent factors such that Hispanic participants were higher on average on acting with awareness scores and lower on average on describing and observing scores. The TSA model failed to estimate significant differences on acting with awareness score for participants with PTSD diagnosis. Additionally, in the TSA model, there was an increase in the effect size of Hispanic participants' baseline describing and observing estimates, thus overestimating differences in respective scores for Hispanic participants. Failing to correct for MNI/DIF in mindfulness scale scores can impact inferences and effect sizes for group differences in mindfulness thus creating bias in characterizing mindfulness, particularly for Hispanic individuals and those with PTSD diagnoses.

Prevention ScienceVol. 26(8)
University of Miami (US), University of New Mexico (US), RTI International (US), Florida International University (US)
RTI International, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.