The Scaling Factor Between Jump Height and Ground Contact Time in Drop Jumps: A Linear Relationship at the Individual Level

Boccia, G, Serranò, S, Bonelli, B, La Torre, A, and Pavei, G. The scaling factor between jump height and ground contact time in drop jumps: A linear relationship at the individual level. J Strength Cond Res 40(2): 152-157, 2026-The extent to which jump height scales with changes in ground contact time (GCT) remains unknown. Establishing this relationship would enable more accurate comparisons of rebounds with different GCTs. Currently, to reliably compare reactive strength index (RSI) values, it is necessary to consider only those with similar contact time parameters. Elite young track and field athletes performed drop jumps from a 40 cm box under 3 distinct instructional conditions: (a) trade-off strategy-minimizing GCT while maximizing jump height; (b) maximizing jump height; (c) minimizing GCT. A hierarchical linear regression model was applied, with GCT and sex (male/female) as independent variables and jump height as the dependent variable. Compared with the trade-off condition, focusing on short GCT led to a 21-millisecond reduction in GCT ( p < 0.0001) but also a 5.9-cm decrease in jump height ( p < 0.0001). Conversely, prioritizing jump height increased jump height by 4.8 cm ( p < 0.0001) but prolonged GCT by 49 milliseconds ( p < 0.0001). However, RSI remained unaffected by instructions ( p = 0.567). A significant main effect of GCT on jump height was observed ( β = 0.154; p < 0.00001). The full model, incorporating random and fixed effects, accounted for 94% of the variance in jump height. At the individual level, our findings confirm a linear relationship between GCT and jump height. This relationship underscores the importance of considering the GCT-jump height trade-off when assessing drop jump performance and highlights the need for evaluations across various GCT ranges rather than relying solely on 1 jump strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005287
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Scaling Factor Between Jump Height and Ground Contact Time in Drop Jumps: A Linear Relationship at the Individual Level

Gaspare Pavei, Antonio La Torre, Gennaro Boccia, Barbara Bonelli et al.
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Sports Performance and Training
article

The Scaling Factor Between Jump Height and Ground Contact Time in Drop Jumps: A Linear Relationship at the Individual Level

Gaspare Pavei, Antonio La Torre, Gennaro Boccia, Barbara Bonelli, S Serrano
article en

Abstract

Boccia, G, Serranò, S, Bonelli, B, La Torre, A, and Pavei, G. The scaling factor between jump height and ground contact time in drop jumps: A linear relationship at the individual level. J Strength Cond Res 40(2): 152-157, 2026-The extent to which jump height scales with changes in ground contact time (GCT) remains unknown. Establishing this relationship would enable more accurate comparisons of rebounds with different GCTs. Currently, to reliably compare reactive strength index (RSI) values, it is necessary to consider only those with similar contact time parameters. Elite young track and field athletes performed drop jumps from a 40 cm box under 3 distinct instructional conditions: (a) trade-off strategy-minimizing GCT while maximizing jump height; (b) maximizing jump height; (c) minimizing GCT. A hierarchical linear regression model was applied, with GCT and sex (male/female) as independent variables and jump height as the dependent variable. Compared with the trade-off condition, focusing on short GCT led to a 21-millisecond reduction in GCT ( p < 0.0001) but also a 5.9-cm decrease in jump height ( p < 0.0001). Conversely, prioritizing jump height increased jump height by 4.8 cm ( p < 0.0001) but prolonged GCT by 49 milliseconds ( p < 0.0001). However, RSI remained unaffected by instructions ( p = 0.567). A significant main effect of GCT on jump height was observed ( β = 0.154; p < 0.00001). The full model, incorporating random and fixed effects, accounted for 94% of the variance in jump height. At the individual level, our findings confirm a linear relationship between GCT and jump height. This relationship underscores the importance of considering the GCT-jump height trade-off when assessing drop jump performance and highlights the need for evaluations across various GCT ranges rather than relying solely on 1 jump strategy.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning ResearchVol. 40(2)
Foundation for Biomedical Research (US), University of Milan (IT), Italian Society of Physiotherapy (IT), University of Turin (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.