A pilot study on anogenital distance in non-pregnant and pregnant Merino ewes and ewe hoggets measured by calipers and image analysis

Reproductive traits are fundamental phenotypic traits selected to achieve optimal production efficiency. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of four measurements of anogenital distances (AGD; in mm) and compare them with ewe pregnancy status, measured via pregnancy scanning, using data collected from 80 Merino ewes and 80 ewe hoggets. Digital calipers were used to measure AGDs (AC - anus to clitoris, AVV - anus to ventral vulva commissure, AF - anus to fourchette and VV - vulva length) in each sheep twice by three assessors. High-resolution images were taken for each sheep to conduct further measurements of AGD using an image analysis software. The measurements conducted with the image analysis were correlated with the pregnancy status of ewe hoggets for AF (P < 0.002), VV (P < 0.001) and AVV (P < 0.002), but no association was found for AC (P > 0.05). The measurements performed with calipers by three assessors were more variable compared to image analysis, resulting in lower correlations between the first and second measurements taken on the same animal. The relationship found between three AGD measurements (AF, AVV and VV), and pregnancy status in the ewe hoggets, demonstrates the potential to use this trait as an inexpensive method to estimate pregnancy status. The association with pregnancy status, especially in ewe hoggets, could be easily adopted by producers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Reproduction Science
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2025.108072
Primary Topic
Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A pilot study on anogenital distance in non-pregnant and pregnant Merino ewes and ewe hoggets measured by calipers and image analysis

Kiro Petrovski, Leesa-Joy Flanagan, Gebremeskel Mamu Werid, Mariana Caetano et al.
Animal Reproduction Science
Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
article

A pilot study on anogenital distance in non-pregnant and pregnant Merino ewes and ewe hoggets measured by calipers and image analysis

Kiro Petrovski, Leesa-Joy Flanagan, Gebremeskel Mamu Werid, Mariana Caetano, Tianna Rianne Boyce, Lillian P Carlyon, Bruno Alves
article en

Abstract

Reproductive traits are fundamental phenotypic traits selected to achieve optimal production efficiency. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of four measurements of anogenital distances (AGD; in mm) and compare them with ewe pregnancy status, measured via pregnancy scanning, using data collected from 80 Merino ewes and 80 ewe hoggets. Digital calipers were used to measure AGDs (AC - anus to clitoris, AVV - anus to ventral vulva commissure, AF - anus to fourchette and VV - vulva length) in each sheep twice by three assessors. High-resolution images were taken for each sheep to conduct further measurements of AGD using an image analysis software. The measurements conducted with the image analysis were correlated with the pregnancy status of ewe hoggets for AF (P < 0.002), VV (P < 0.001) and AVV (P < 0.002), but no association was found for AC (P > 0.05). The measurements performed with calipers by three assessors were more variable compared to image analysis, resulting in lower correlations between the first and second measurements taken on the same animal. The relationship found between three AGD measurements (AF, AVV and VV), and pregnancy status in the ewe hoggets, demonstrates the potential to use this trait as an inexpensive method to estimate pregnancy status. The association with pregnancy status, especially in ewe hoggets, could be easily adopted by producers.

Animal Reproduction ScienceVol. 285
Meat & Livestock Australia (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.