Comparable Workout Output by Using Velocity Feedback or Perceived Exertion in Male and Female Recreationally Resistance Trained Individuals

Naclerio, F, Larumbe-Zabala, E, Chapman, M, Gonzalez-Frutos, P, and Triplett, NT. Comparable workout output by using velocity feedback or perceived exertion in male and female recreationally resistance trained individuals. J Strength Cond Res 40(2): 143-151, 2026-We compared an objective (velocity feedback [VEL]) vs. a subjective (rating of perceived exertion [RPE]) autoregulatory method to estimate velocity drop thresholds associated with low (10%), moderate (20%) metabolic fatigue, and muscular endurance (40%) during continuous sets in the back squat (BSQ) exercise using either 50% or 75% of the 1 repetition maximum (1RM). After five sessions of familiarization and determining the 1RM, 19 male subjects (24.5 ± 6 years) and 9 female subjects (30.4 ± 8 years) underwent two identical 6-day testing sessions over 2 weeks (12 sessions) using the VEL (first 6 sessions) or the RPE method (last 6 sessions). The assessments of velocity thresholds and relative loads were randomized for each 6-day testing period. The average velocity (AV) and the OMNI-RES (0-10) scale scores were measured for every repetition of each set. Under VEL, sets ended after completing two consecutive repetitions below the target threshold. A linear mixed-effects model setting velocity thresholds, method, and their interaction as fixed effects, and subjects as random components, was conducted. Although no significant differences between methods were identified for the percentage of velocity decrease and the total number of repetitions completed per set, compared with VEL, under the RPE method, fewer repetitions were completed below the thresholds for both 50 and 75% 1RM ( p < 0.01 and g > 1 in all cases). In conclusion, both methods, VEL and RPE, seem useful for estimating velocity changes during continuous sets of BSQ. However, the RPE method allowed for fewer unnecessary repetitions when squatting until 10, 20, and 40% of velocity decrease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005289
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparable Workout Output by Using Velocity Feedback or Perceived Exertion in Male and Female Recreationally Resistance Trained Individuals

N. Travis Triplett, Eneko Larumbe‐Zabala, Fernando Naclerio, Mark L. Chapman et al.
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Sports Performance and Training
article

Comparable Workout Output by Using Velocity Feedback or Perceived Exertion in Male and Female Recreationally Resistance Trained Individuals

N. Travis Triplett, Eneko Larumbe‐Zabala, Fernando Naclerio, Mark L. Chapman, Pablo González
article en

Abstract

Naclerio, F, Larumbe-Zabala, E, Chapman, M, Gonzalez-Frutos, P, and Triplett, NT. Comparable workout output by using velocity feedback or perceived exertion in male and female recreationally resistance trained individuals. J Strength Cond Res 40(2): 143-151, 2026-We compared an objective (velocity feedback [VEL]) vs. a subjective (rating of perceived exertion [RPE]) autoregulatory method to estimate velocity drop thresholds associated with low (10%), moderate (20%) metabolic fatigue, and muscular endurance (40%) during continuous sets in the back squat (BSQ) exercise using either 50% or 75% of the 1 repetition maximum (1RM). After five sessions of familiarization and determining the 1RM, 19 male subjects (24.5 ± 6 years) and 9 female subjects (30.4 ± 8 years) underwent two identical 6-day testing sessions over 2 weeks (12 sessions) using the VEL (first 6 sessions) or the RPE method (last 6 sessions). The assessments of velocity thresholds and relative loads were randomized for each 6-day testing period. The average velocity (AV) and the OMNI-RES (0-10) scale scores were measured for every repetition of each set. Under VEL, sets ended after completing two consecutive repetitions below the target threshold. A linear mixed-effects model setting velocity thresholds, method, and their interaction as fixed effects, and subjects as random components, was conducted. Although no significant differences between methods were identified for the percentage of velocity decrease and the total number of repetitions completed per set, compared with VEL, under the RPE method, fewer repetitions were completed below the thresholds for both 50 and 75% 1RM ( p < 0.01 and g > 1 in all cases). In conclusion, both methods, VEL and RPE, seem useful for estimating velocity changes during continuous sets of BSQ. However, the RPE method allowed for fewer unnecessary repetitions when squatting until 10, 20, and 40% of velocity decrease.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning ResearchVol. 40(2)
Universidad Francisco de Vitoria (ES), Fundación Canaria de Investigación Sanitaria (ES), Appalachian State University (US), University of Greenwich (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.