Evaluation of Acute Metabolic and Physiologic Responses Obtained From Sprint Interval Trainings Performed by Low Cadence/High Resistance and High Cadence/Low Resistance

As, H and Ozkaya, O. Evaluation of acute metabolic and physiologic responses obtained from sprint interval trainings performed by low cadence/high resistance and high cadence/low resistance. J Strength Cond Res 40(2): e117-e124, 2026-This study aimed to compare the acute metabolic and physiologic responses obtained from different sprint interval training (SIT) protocols performed by low cadence/high resistance and high cadence/low resistance. Ten moderately trained men completed two 6 × 30-second all-out SIT protocols with 4 minutes recovery periods as follows: (a) traditional fixed-load protocol, that is, using 7.5% of body mass (BM), (traditional SIT [SIT TRAD ]) and (b) adjusted-load protocol, that is, using an initial load of 5% of BM and then adjusting load for subsequent bouts based on the criterion of ≥120 rpm mean cadence for the last 5 seconds of each 30-second bout, (modified SIT [SIT MOD ]). Gas exchange variables and blood lactate concentration ([La]) were measured before, during, and after both protocols. Total net O 2 consumption and 3-hour postexercise recovery fat oxidation values were similar between SIT TRAD and SIT MOD ( p > 0.05). However, SIT MOD demonstrated a greater anaerobic contribution than SIT TRAD ( p < 0.001), despite similar aerobic contributions ( p = 0.32). The mean cadence was significantly higher in SIT MOD (139 ± 3) than that in SIT TRAD (98 ± 5 rpm; p < 0.001). SIT MOD elicited both the highest peak delta [La] (∆[La]) at the end of the session (19.6 ± 1.4 vs. 17.8 ± 1.8 mmol·L -1 , respectively; p = 0.003) and higher ∆[La] values at the 30th, 60th, 90th, and 120th minute of recovery compared with SIT TRAD (11.1 ± 1.4 vs. 8.3 ± 2.2, 4.5 ± 0.6 vs. 3.1 ± 1.1, 3.2 ± 0.8 vs. 1.9 ± 0.8, and 2.1 ± 0.9 vs. 0.7 ± 0.6 mmol·L -1 , respectively; p < 0.05). In conclusion, the high-cadence/low-resistance protocol (i.e., SIT MOD ) resulted in a greater anaerobic contribution than the traditional fixed-load protocol that leaded low cadence/high resistance (i.e., SIT TRAD ).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005288
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Acute Metabolic and Physiologic Responses Obtained From Sprint Interval Trainings Performed by Low Cadence/High Resistance and High Cadence/Low Resistance

Özgür Özkaya, Hakan As
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Sports Performance and Training
article

Evaluation of Acute Metabolic and Physiologic Responses Obtained From Sprint Interval Trainings Performed by Low Cadence/High Resistance and High Cadence/Low Resistance

Özgür Özkaya, Hakan As
article en

Abstract

As, H and Ozkaya, O. Evaluation of acute metabolic and physiologic responses obtained from sprint interval trainings performed by low cadence/high resistance and high cadence/low resistance. J Strength Cond Res 40(2): e117-e124, 2026-This study aimed to compare the acute metabolic and physiologic responses obtained from different sprint interval training (SIT) protocols performed by low cadence/high resistance and high cadence/low resistance. Ten moderately trained men completed two 6 × 30-second all-out SIT protocols with 4 minutes recovery periods as follows: (a) traditional fixed-load protocol, that is, using 7.5% of body mass (BM), (traditional SIT [SIT TRAD ]) and (b) adjusted-load protocol, that is, using an initial load of 5% of BM and then adjusting load for subsequent bouts based on the criterion of ≥120 rpm mean cadence for the last 5 seconds of each 30-second bout, (modified SIT [SIT MOD ]). Gas exchange variables and blood lactate concentration ([La]) were measured before, during, and after both protocols. Total net O 2 consumption and 3-hour postexercise recovery fat oxidation values were similar between SIT TRAD and SIT MOD ( p > 0.05). However, SIT MOD demonstrated a greater anaerobic contribution than SIT TRAD ( p < 0.001), despite similar aerobic contributions ( p = 0.32). The mean cadence was significantly higher in SIT MOD (139 ± 3) than that in SIT TRAD (98 ± 5 rpm; p < 0.001). SIT MOD elicited both the highest peak delta [La] (∆[La]) at the end of the session (19.6 ± 1.4 vs. 17.8 ± 1.8 mmol·L -1 , respectively; p = 0.003) and higher ∆[La] values at the 30th, 60th, 90th, and 120th minute of recovery compared with SIT TRAD (11.1 ± 1.4 vs. 8.3 ± 2.2, 4.5 ± 0.6 vs. 3.1 ± 1.1, 3.2 ± 0.8 vs. 1.9 ± 0.8, and 2.1 ± 0.9 vs. 0.7 ± 0.6 mmol·L -1 , respectively; p < 0.05). In conclusion, the high-cadence/low-resistance protocol (i.e., SIT MOD ) resulted in a greater anaerobic contribution than the traditional fixed-load protocol that leaded low cadence/high resistance (i.e., SIT TRAD ).

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning ResearchVol. 40(2)
Ege University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.