Developing a bespoke patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for genital dermatoses: A pilot service evaluation
BackgroundGenital dermatoses (GDs) significantly impact sexual health and psychosocial wellbeing, yet no specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) exists for this population. Our study aimed to appraise patient perspectives on GDs by composing a PROM to evaluate biopsychosocial concerns and compare outcomes between new and follow-up patients results.MethodsA literature review of applicable existing PROMs resulted in the selection of 14 pre-validated questions covering 3 domains: physical symptoms, quality-of-life and mental health. The response rate was 77.1% for the final PROM, with 48 responses for analysis following the exclusion of 6 incomplete responses.ResultsThe follow-up group showed a reduction in average scores compared to new patients, decreasing from 2.41 to 2.05 (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) with a lower score indicating better outcomes. All the questions showed a decrease in score from new to follow-up patients. Results revealed significant improvements in the average pain score among follow-up patients.ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate the necessity of PROMs in improving patient-centred care. Results indicated significant improvements in physical wellbeing in follow-up patients, affirming efficacy of existing treatments and suggested a necessity for greater psychological support to those suffering from genital dermatoses.
Authors
- Cindy Sethi
- A. Rajesh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6938-3621)
- Elizabeth S. Maxwell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5694-0268)
- James Eaves (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2511-4279)
- Lauma Sarkane (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1133-2357)
- Beverley Azoba (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2940-8250)
Institutions
- King's College London (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of STD & AIDS
- Published
- 2025-12-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624251406029
- Primary Topic
- Genital Health and Disease
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00