Phase 1, randomized, crossover study comparing intravenous GTX-104 to oral nimodipine in healthy human subjects

Enterally-administered nimodipine is the only approved drug formulation available in the United States for treatment of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Intravenous nimodipine is available in other countries but it contains a high concentration of ethanol that is irritating to the vasculature, can alter the effects of other medications, impair neurological assessments and is potentially harmful to the liver. We developed a sterile aqueous solution of nimodipine solubilized in polysorbate 80 micelles (GTX-104) that circumvents these problems. GTX-104 has been administered to 168 healthy human volunteers in 2 studies. We report the second study here, a phase 1, single center, randomized, 2-period cross over study that assessed the pharmacokinetics of GTX-104 and oral nimodipine capsules, which is the reference standard, in 58 healthy human volunteers. GTX-104 was administered for 72 hours as a continuous infusion of 0.15 mg/hour with a 30 minute bolus infusion of 4 mg every 4 hours. Nimodipine capsules were administered orally at a dose of 60 mg every 4 hours for 72 hours. The maximum plasma concentrations (geometric least square means) after the first dose of each formulation were similar (GTX-104: 63 ng/mL, n = 57 versus nimodipine capsules: 69 ng/mL, n = 56, ratio and 90% confidence interval [CI] of geometric LSmeans: 92% [90% CI: 82-104%]). The areas under the concentration-time curves on the 3rd day at steady state also were the same (GTX-104: 492 ng*h/mL, n = 56 versus nimodipine capsules: 462 ng*h/mL, n = 55, ratio and 90% CI of geometric LSmeans: 106% [90% CI: 99-114%]). The secondary pharmacokinetic parameters (daily maximum concentration at steady-state and time to maximum concentration) were also similar for the 2 formulations. The variability in PK parameters was less for GTX-104 compared to nimodipine capsules. The average oral bioavailability for nimodipine capsules was 7%. These results enabled a Phase 3 safety study of GTX-104 in humans with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323162
Primary Topic
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phase 1, randomized, crossover study comparing intravenous GTX-104 to oral nimodipine in healthy human subjects

James Longstreth, R. Loch Macdonald, S. George Kottayil, Amresh Kumar et al.
PLoS ONE
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
article

Phase 1, randomized, crossover study comparing intravenous GTX-104 to oral nimodipine in healthy human subjects

James Longstreth, R. Loch Macdonald, S. George Kottayil, Amresh Kumar, Carrie D’Andrea, Parushi Kohli
article en

Abstract

Enterally-administered nimodipine is the only approved drug formulation available in the United States for treatment of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Intravenous nimodipine is available in other countries but it contains a high concentration of ethanol that is irritating to the vasculature, can alter the effects of other medications, impair neurological assessments and is potentially harmful to the liver. We developed a sterile aqueous solution of nimodipine solubilized in polysorbate 80 micelles (GTX-104) that circumvents these problems. GTX-104 has been administered to 168 healthy human volunteers in 2 studies. We report the second study here, a phase 1, single center, randomized, 2-period cross over study that assessed the pharmacokinetics of GTX-104 and oral nimodipine capsules, which is the reference standard, in 58 healthy human volunteers. GTX-104 was administered for 72 hours as a continuous infusion of 0.15 mg/hour with a 30 minute bolus infusion of 4 mg every 4 hours. Nimodipine capsules were administered orally at a dose of 60 mg every 4 hours for 72 hours. The maximum plasma concentrations (geometric least square means) after the first dose of each formulation were similar (GTX-104: 63 ng/mL, n = 57 versus nimodipine capsules: 69 ng/mL, n = 56, ratio and 90% confidence interval [CI] of geometric LSmeans: 92% [90% CI: 82-104%]). The areas under the concentration-time curves on the 3rd day at steady state also were the same (GTX-104: 492 ng*h/mL, n = 56 versus nimodipine capsules: 462 ng*h/mL, n = 55, ratio and 90% CI of geometric LSmeans: 106% [90% CI: 99-114%]). The secondary pharmacokinetic parameters (daily maximum concentration at steady-state and time to maximum concentration) were also similar for the 2 formulations. The variability in PK parameters was less for GTX-104 compared to nimodipine capsules. The average oral bioavailability for nimodipine capsules was 7%. These results enabled a Phase 3 safety study of GTX-104 in humans with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(12)
University of Saint Mary of the Lake (US), Community Regional Medical Center (US), Agile Therapeutics (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.