Can Media Act as a Soft Regulator of Safe AI Development? A Game Theoretical Analysis

When developers of artificial intelligence (AI) products need to decide between profit and safety for the users, they likely choose profit. Untrustworthy AI technology must come packaged with tangible negative consequences. Here, we envisage those consequences as the loss of reputation caused by media coverage of their misdeeds, disseminated to the public. We explore whether media coverage has the potential to push AI creators into the production of safe products, enabling widespread adoption of AI technology. We created artificial populations of self-interested creators and users and studied them through the lens of evolutionary game theory. Our results reveal that media is indeed able to foster cooperation between creators and users, but not always. Cooperation does not evolve if the quality of the information provided by the media is not reliable enough, or if the costs of either accessing media or ensuring safety are too high. By shaping public perception and holding developers accountable, media emerges as a powerful soft regulator – guiding AI safety even in the absence of formal government oversight.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ALIFE
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/isal.a.918
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Media Act as a Soft Regulator of Safe AI Development? A Game Theoretical Analysis

Zia Ush Shamszaman, Zhao Song, The Anh Han, Hélder Fonseca et al.
ALIFE
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Can Media Act as a Soft Regulator of Safe AI Development? A Game Theoretical Analysis

Zia Ush Shamszaman, Zhao Song, The Anh Han, Hélder Fonseca, Ndidi Bianca Ogbo, Daniele Proverbio, Marcus Krellner, Paolo Bova, Theodor Cimpeanu, Alessandro Di Stefano, Elias Fernández Domingos, Manh Hong Duong, Fernando Pereira dos Santos, Alessio Buscemi, Ali Kashif Bashir, António B. Fernandes, Simon T. Powers, Nataliya Balabanova
article en

Abstract

When developers of artificial intelligence (AI) products need to decide between profit and safety for the users, they likely choose profit. Untrustworthy AI technology must come packaged with tangible negative consequences. Here, we envisage those consequences as the loss of reputation caused by media coverage of their misdeeds, disseminated to the public. We explore whether media coverage has the potential to push AI creators into the production of safe products, enabling widespread adoption of AI technology. We created artificial populations of self-interested creators and users and studied them through the lens of evolutionary game theory. Our results reveal that media is indeed able to foster cooperation between creators and users, but not always. Cooperation does not evolve if the quality of the information provided by the media is not reliable enough, or if the costs of either accessing media or ensuring safety are too high. By shaping public perception and holding developers accountable, media emerges as a powerful soft regulator – guiding AI safety even in the absence of formal government oversight.

ALIFEVol. 37
University of Stirling (GB), Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores Investigação e Desenvolvimento (PT), Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), University of Trento (IT), Hospital Prof. Dr. Fernando Fonseca (PT), Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LU), University of Birmingham (GB), Teesside University (GB), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Future of Life Institute, European Commission, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.