Utility of an LLM-powered experts-in-the-loop chatbot for pre- and post-operative care of cataract surgery patients

PurposeTo evaluate the utility of <i>CataractBot</i>, an LLM (Large Language Model)-powered chatbot that provides doctor-verified answers to patient questions about cataract surgery. We examine its use by both end-users (patients and attendants) and medical experts.MethodsA 24-week study was conducted to evaluate <i>CataractBot</i> among patients, their attendants, doctors, and patient coordinators. The bot responded instantly to questions by querying a knowledge base curated by medical professionals. Each response was asynchronously verified by an ophthalmologist (for medical questions) or a patient coordinator (for logistical questions), and their edits contributed to updating the knowledge base, thereby minimizing future expert intervention. A mixed-methods analysis was conducted on interaction logs, including patient and attendant questions, chatbot answers, and expert verifications.ResultsA total of 318 patients and attendants sent 1,992 messages, and LLM-generated answers were verified by five doctors and two coordinators. Questions asked pre-surgery were significantly more than post-surgery <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo><</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.001</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math>. Participants asked significantly more medical than logistical questions <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn>309</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>7.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo><</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.001</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math>. Doctors rated 84.5% of <i>CataractBot</i>'s answers to medical questions as accurate and complete. Their edits, which mainly involved adding information, increased the acceptance of the bot's answers by 19.0% over time.Conclusion<i>CataractBot</i> was predominantly used to address medical questions. It incorporated expert corrections to improve its answers and reduce the experts' bot-related workload over time. This study highlights the potential of LLM-powered chatbots to support patient-provider communication in ophthalmology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Ophthalmology
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721251396664
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utility of an LLM-powered experts-in-the-loop chatbot for pre- and post-operative care of cataract surgery patients

Mithun Thulasidas, Geeta Fulari, Kaushik Murali, Bhuvan Sachdeva et al.
European Journal of Ophthalmology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Utility of an LLM-powered experts-in-the-loop chatbot for pre- and post-operative care of cataract surgery patients

Mithun Thulasidas, Geeta Fulari, Kaushik Murali, Bhuvan Sachdeva, Mohit Jain, SowmyaRaveendra Murthy, Pragnya Ramjee, Rahul Kumar Sharma
article en

Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the utility of <i>CataractBot</i>, an LLM (Large Language Model)-powered chatbot that provides doctor-verified answers to patient questions about cataract surgery. We examine its use by both end-users (patients and attendants) and medical experts.MethodsA 24-week study was conducted to evaluate <i>CataractBot</i> among patients, their attendants, doctors, and patient coordinators. The bot responded instantly to questions by querying a knowledge base curated by medical professionals. Each response was asynchronously verified by an ophthalmologist (for medical questions) or a patient coordinator (for logistical questions), and their edits contributed to updating the knowledge base, thereby minimizing future expert intervention. A mixed-methods analysis was conducted on interaction logs, including patient and attendant questions, chatbot answers, and expert verifications.ResultsA total of 318 patients and attendants sent 1,992 messages, and LLM-generated answers were verified by five doctors and two coordinators. Questions asked pre-surgery were significantly more than post-surgery <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo><</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.001</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math>. Participants asked significantly more medical than logistical questions <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn>309</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>7.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo><</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.001</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math>. Doctors rated 84.5% of <i>CataractBot</i>'s answers to medical questions as accurate and complete. Their edits, which mainly involved adding information, increased the acceptance of the bot's answers by 19.0% over time.Conclusion<i>CataractBot</i> was predominantly used to address medical questions. It incorporated expert corrections to improve its answers and reduce the experts' bot-related workload over time. This study highlights the potential of LLM-powered chatbots to support patient-provider communication in ophthalmology.

European Journal of Ophthalmology
Microsoft Research (India) (IN), Eye Hospital in Bangalore (IN), Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.