Up from the archive: Disability, Queerness, and the Politics of Worth. Kim Andreassen thinks with

David G. Beswick's 1970 article ‘Attitudes to taking human life’ holds an interesting place within sociological research and its content, when reinterpreted through the intersecting lenses of queer theory, critical disability studies and design justice principles, can provide a contemporary understanding of human life. Situated within a historical context of pathologisation and exclusion, the original study is interrogated for its normative assumptions, methodological limitations and ethical omissions, particularly its treatment of disability and absence of queer perspectives. This piece proposes a reimagining of the initial survey design and delivery in a manner that centres lived experience, challenges ableist and heteronormative framings, and affirms the dignity of marginalised communities. In doing so, it advocates for inclusive, participatory and trauma-informed approaches to sociological inquiry that honour historical legacies and future possibilities – and the hope that researchers will use the redesigned survey to understand current Australian attitudes towards killing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of sociology
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833251384704
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Up from the archive: Disability, Queerness, and the Politics of Worth. Kim Andreassen thinks with

Kim Andreassen
Journal of sociology
Disability Rights and Representation
article

Up from the archive: Disability, Queerness, and the Politics of Worth. Kim Andreassen thinks with

Kim Andreassen
article en

Abstract

David G. Beswick's 1970 article ‘Attitudes to taking human life’ holds an interesting place within sociological research and its content, when reinterpreted through the intersecting lenses of queer theory, critical disability studies and design justice principles, can provide a contemporary understanding of human life. Situated within a historical context of pathologisation and exclusion, the original study is interrogated for its normative assumptions, methodological limitations and ethical omissions, particularly its treatment of disability and absence of queer perspectives. This piece proposes a reimagining of the initial survey design and delivery in a manner that centres lived experience, challenges ableist and heteronormative framings, and affirms the dignity of marginalised communities. In doing so, it advocates for inclusive, participatory and trauma-informed approaches to sociological inquiry that honour historical legacies and future possibilities – and the hope that researchers will use the redesigned survey to understand current Australian attitudes towards killing.

Journal of sociologyVol. 61(4)
Curtin University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.