The Impact of Corporate Social Irresponsibility in the Agri‐Food Sector and Its Policy Implications

ABSTRACT The financial impacts of Corporate Social Irresponsibility (CSI) on publicly traded agricultural firms are analysed using an EGARCH event‐study framework and 18,635 CSI incidents. We find that CSI events are associated with significantly lower stock returns and elevated market volatility. The clearest and most persistent return penalties arise for novel, sharp, broad‐reaching, and lower‐severity incidents, while high‐severity incidents are associated primarily with large and significant increases in volatility in the immediate post‐event windows. Larger firms are more resilient to CSI shocks than smaller firms, highlighting the role of firm size in absorbing reputational damage. The findings show that agri‐food firms are financially exposed not only to catastrophic ESG failures but also to more routine and unexpected incidents, with implications for ESG governance, disclosure and crisis management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agricultural Economics
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.70094
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Impact of Corporate Social Irresponsibility in the Agri‐Food Sector and Its Policy Implications

Erdinç Akyıldırım, Shaen Corbet, Frank Scrimgeour, Riccardo Scarpa A
1 citations
Journal of Agricultural Economics
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
3.34
article

The Impact of Corporate Social Irresponsibility in the Agri‐Food Sector and Its Policy Implications

Erdinç Akyıldırım, Shaen Corbet, Frank Scrimgeour, Riccardo Scarpa A
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The financial impacts of Corporate Social Irresponsibility (CSI) on publicly traded agricultural firms are analysed using an EGARCH event‐study framework and 18,635 CSI incidents. We find that CSI events are associated with significantly lower stock returns and elevated market volatility. The clearest and most persistent return penalties arise for novel, sharp, broad‐reaching, and lower‐severity incidents, while high‐severity incidents are associated primarily with large and significant increases in volatility in the immediate post‐event windows. Larger firms are more resilient to CSI shocks than smaller firms, highlighting the role of firm size in absorbing reputational damage. The findings show that agri‐food firms are financially exposed not only to catastrophic ESG failures but also to more routine and unexpected incidents, with implications for ESG governance, disclosure and crisis management.

Journal of Agricultural Economics
University of Verona (IT), University of Nottingham (GB), Durham University (GB), University of Zurich (CH), Dublin City University (IE), University of Waikato (NZ)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
3.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon