Institutional learning in the energy transition: The case of offshore wind in the United States

The U.S. East Coast holds significant potential for offshore wind (OSW) development, offering a pathway for large-scale decarbonization. Achieving it requires creating a new industrial sector. We analyze efforts from 2017 to 2024, a period of major challenges, to understand what is needed for political institutions—policies, regulations, practices, and organizational structures—to foster this transition. Using social learning theory and a multiple case study design—three cases, each centered on a key function of OSW deployment within one state—we examine whether and how state actors accessed new information and enacted novel practices and structures. The study reveals varied, emergent, and context-dependent learning pathways, encompassing learning processes (acquiring, creating, interpreting, and disseminating new information) and learning outcomes (changes in practices, programs, or policies). Evolving political institutions act not only as incumbents, but also as disruptors. The revenue stabilization case (NY) illustrates intra-jurisdictional, incremental learning within a single institution and highlights the importance of conceptual outcomes. The fisheries compensation case (MA) demonstrates multi-jurisdictional, transformational learning through new multi-state venues that iteratively defined problems and developed solutions amidst on-going contestation. The coordinated transmission case (NJ) demonstrates inter-jurisdictional learning and underscores the importance of power dynamics, as state actors reshaped existing processes to advance novel coordinated planning. Across cases, we identify five factors—problem definition, jurisdictional scope, clarity of authority, problem-mandate alignment, and challenge complexity—that shape learning pathways. Institutional learning in sustainability transitions is an important area for future research, given the urgency of accelerating energy transitions and the growing institutional barriers impeding them. • Case studies on learning and innovation in public institutions for offshore wind. • Cases: revenue stabilization, fisheries compensation, coordinated grid planning. • Case studies show intra-, multi-, and inter-jurisdictional institutional learning. • Learning pathways: emergent, varied, and shaped by problem and governance contexts. • Institutional learning is key to managing risk and uncertainty in energy transitions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104475
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional learning in the energy transition: The case of offshore wind in the United States

Anke-Susanne Müller, Elizabeth J. Wilson, Stephanie Lenhart, Tyler Hansen
1 citations
Energy Research & Social Science
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
4.20
article

Institutional learning in the energy transition: The case of offshore wind in the United States

Anke-Susanne Müller, Elizabeth J. Wilson, Stephanie Lenhart, Tyler Hansen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The U.S. East Coast holds significant potential for offshore wind (OSW) development, offering a pathway for large-scale decarbonization. Achieving it requires creating a new industrial sector. We analyze efforts from 2017 to 2024, a period of major challenges, to understand what is needed for political institutions—policies, regulations, practices, and organizational structures—to foster this transition. Using social learning theory and a multiple case study design—three cases, each centered on a key function of OSW deployment within one state—we examine whether and how state actors accessed new information and enacted novel practices and structures. The study reveals varied, emergent, and context-dependent learning pathways, encompassing learning processes (acquiring, creating, interpreting, and disseminating new information) and learning outcomes (changes in practices, programs, or policies). Evolving political institutions act not only as incumbents, but also as disruptors. The revenue stabilization case (NY) illustrates intra-jurisdictional, incremental learning within a single institution and highlights the importance of conceptual outcomes. The fisheries compensation case (MA) demonstrates multi-jurisdictional, transformational learning through new multi-state venues that iteratively defined problems and developed solutions amidst on-going contestation. The coordinated transmission case (NJ) demonstrates inter-jurisdictional learning and underscores the importance of power dynamics, as state actors reshaped existing processes to advance novel coordinated planning. Across cases, we identify five factors—problem definition, jurisdictional scope, clarity of authority, problem-mandate alignment, and challenge complexity—that shape learning pathways. Institutional learning in sustainability transitions is an important area for future research, given the urgency of accelerating energy transitions and the growing institutional barriers impeding them. • Case studies on learning and innovation in public institutions for offshore wind. • Cases: revenue stabilization, fisheries compensation, coordinated grid planning. • Case studies show intra-, multi-, and inter-jurisdictional institutional learning. • Learning pathways: emergent, varied, and shaped by problem and governance contexts. • Institutional learning is key to managing risk and uncertainty in energy transitions.

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 131
Dartmouth College (US), Boise State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.