Morpheme knowledge is shaped by information available through orthography

A large portion of words in a language are formed by combining smaller meaningful units called morphemes (e.g., teach + -er → teacher). Understanding a language's morphology is vital for skilled reading as it allows readers to interpret both familiar and unfamiliar words (e.g., tweeter). It is widely agreed that children rely on reading experience to acquire morpheme knowledge in English, and emerging research suggests that different aspects of this experience may impact affix learning in different ways. We contrasted three potential definitions of what constitutes readers' affix experience using the morpheme interference paradigm with 120 adults. We found that skilled readers' affix knowledge most closely aligns with a definition proposing that affix learning is primarily supported by experience with words in which affixes are identifiable without specialised linguistic knowledge. Due to the nature of morpheme presentation in English orthography, this excludes a significant number of genuinely complex words, while including affix-like patterns in non-meaningful contexts (e.g., -er in corner). This definition also posits that these morphological false alarms actively hinder learning. Our research represents a critical step towards a psychologically realistic theory of morpheme learning from text experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02830-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Morpheme knowledge is shaped by information available through orthography

Maria Korochkina, Kathleen Rastle, Holly Cooper, Marc Brysbaert
1 citations
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
3.44
article

Morpheme knowledge is shaped by information available through orthography

Maria Korochkina, Kathleen Rastle, Holly Cooper, Marc Brysbaert
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A large portion of words in a language are formed by combining smaller meaningful units called morphemes (e.g., teach + -er → teacher). Understanding a language's morphology is vital for skilled reading as it allows readers to interpret both familiar and unfamiliar words (e.g., tweeter). It is widely agreed that children rely on reading experience to acquire morpheme knowledge in English, and emerging research suggests that different aspects of this experience may impact affix learning in different ways. We contrasted three potential definitions of what constitutes readers' affix experience using the morpheme interference paradigm with 120 adults. We found that skilled readers' affix knowledge most closely aligns with a definition proposing that affix learning is primarily supported by experience with words in which affixes are identifiable without specialised linguistic knowledge. Due to the nature of morpheme presentation in English orthography, this excludes a significant number of genuinely complex words, while including affix-like patterns in non-meaningful contexts (e.g., -er in corner). This definition also posits that these morphological false alarms actively hinder learning. Our research represents a critical step towards a psychologically realistic theory of morpheme learning from text experience.

Psychonomic Bulletin & ReviewVol. 33(1)
Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.