Comparison of media components and reagents in cultivation and genetic editing of human cells A549

The work presents a comparative analysis of imported and Russian components of media and reagents in the cultivation and genetic editing of human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells. The study used fetal bovine serum (FBS) from Gibco (USA), Intl Kang (China) and Technozerg (Russia), transfection reagents Lipofectamine3000 (USA) and GenJect39 (Russia), as well as OptiMem (USA) and FectoMEM (Russia) media. Cells cultured on all types of FBS retained high proliferative activity and survival, but the type of FBS had a significant effect on cell morphology. In particular, a fibroblast-like morphology was observed on the Technozerg medium. Transfection efficiency was assessed using the empty pCMV-EGFP expression vector and the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated human lambda DNA polymerase gene editing vector PX458-POLL. OptiMem and FectoMEM media maintained high transfection efficiency with either vector. GenJect39 was as efficient as Lipofectamine3000 for pCMV-EGFP transfection, but GenJect39 was significantly less efficient than Lipofectamine3000 for PX458-POLL genome editing. In addition, the choice of serum was shown to have a significant impact on the ability of cells to form colonies after PX458-POLL transfection. These results indicate that the choice of transfection reagent and FBS play an important role in successful experiment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Genetics Microbiology and Virology (Russian)
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/molgen202543042135
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of media components and reagents in cultivation and genetic editing of human cells A549

Anastasia S. Gromova, Аlena V. Makarova, S.A. Naumova
Molecular Genetics Microbiology and Virology (Russian)
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
article

Comparison of media components and reagents in cultivation and genetic editing of human cells A549

Anastasia S. Gromova, Аlena V. Makarova, S.A. Naumova
article en

Abstract

The work presents a comparative analysis of imported and Russian components of media and reagents in the cultivation and genetic editing of human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells. The study used fetal bovine serum (FBS) from Gibco (USA), Intl Kang (China) and Technozerg (Russia), transfection reagents Lipofectamine3000 (USA) and GenJect39 (Russia), as well as OptiMem (USA) and FectoMEM (Russia) media. Cells cultured on all types of FBS retained high proliferative activity and survival, but the type of FBS had a significant effect on cell morphology. In particular, a fibroblast-like morphology was observed on the Technozerg medium. Transfection efficiency was assessed using the empty pCMV-EGFP expression vector and the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated human lambda DNA polymerase gene editing vector PX458-POLL. OptiMem and FectoMEM media maintained high transfection efficiency with either vector. GenJect39 was as efficient as Lipofectamine3000 for pCMV-EGFP transfection, but GenJect39 was significantly less efficient than Lipofectamine3000 for PX458-POLL genome editing. In addition, the choice of serum was shown to have a significant impact on the ability of cells to form colonies after PX458-POLL transfection. These results indicate that the choice of transfection reagent and FBS play an important role in successful experiment.

Molecular Genetics Microbiology and Virology (Russian)Vol. 43(4)
Sechenov University (RU), Kurchatov Institute (RU), Institute of Gene Biology (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.