Studying the mechanisms of prespacer 3’-end formation during CRISPR adaptation via simultaneous gene repression using dCas9

Introduction. Bacteria are capable of integrating a portion of the genetic material of an invading infectious agent as a spacer into the CRISPR array. This process is called CRISPR adaptation and is necessary for bacteria to adequately respond to the same infectious agent in the future. The molecular mechanisms of CRISPR adaptation remain unclear, particularly the role of extra-CRISPR-Cas components in bacteria during prespacer generation and spacer acquisition. In this study, we developed an approach to identifying nucleases responsible for the formation of prespacer 3’-ends in vivo. Materials and methods. We generated a genetic construct based on the pBR322 plasmid vector with gRNAs targeting the genes encoding cellular exonucleases with 3’-5’ activity in E. coli. This genetic construct and the pdCas9 plasmid were transformed into KD403 cells. The level of primed CRISPR adaptation was assessed using PCR and sequencing. The structure of the 3' ends of the prespacers was assessed using the FragSeq short-fragment sequencing method using the Accel-NGS® 1S Plus DNA Library Kit, Swift biosciences (xGen™ ssDNA & Low-Input DNA Library Preparation Kit, IDT). Results. In the KD403 ΔrecB strain with suppressed nucleases, a reduction in primed adaptation was detected, but sequencing revealed no disruption of the 3’ ends of the spacer precursors. Conclusion. Our results contribute to the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of CRISPR adaptation, which may aid in the development of CRISPR-based approaches in medicine and agriculture in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Genetics Microbiology and Virology (Russian)
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/molgen20254304279
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Studying the mechanisms of prespacer 3’-end formation during CRISPR adaptation via simultaneous gene repression using dCas9

Olga Musharova, Konstantin Severinov, Irina Balázs, Yunna S. Petrusenko et al.
Molecular Genetics Microbiology and Virology (Russian)
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
article

Studying the mechanisms of prespacer 3’-end formation during CRISPR adaptation via simultaneous gene repression using dCas9

Olga Musharova, Konstantin Severinov, Irina Balázs, Yunna S. Petrusenko, S.V. Vinogradova
article en

Abstract

Introduction. Bacteria are capable of integrating a portion of the genetic material of an invading infectious agent as a spacer into the CRISPR array. This process is called CRISPR adaptation and is necessary for bacteria to adequately respond to the same infectious agent in the future. The molecular mechanisms of CRISPR adaptation remain unclear, particularly the role of extra-CRISPR-Cas components in bacteria during prespacer generation and spacer acquisition. In this study, we developed an approach to identifying nucleases responsible for the formation of prespacer 3’-ends in vivo. Materials and methods. We generated a genetic construct based on the pBR322 plasmid vector with gRNAs targeting the genes encoding cellular exonucleases with 3’-5’ activity in E. coli. This genetic construct and the pdCas9 plasmid were transformed into KD403 cells. The level of primed CRISPR adaptation was assessed using PCR and sequencing. The structure of the 3' ends of the prespacers was assessed using the FragSeq short-fragment sequencing method using the Accel-NGS® 1S Plus DNA Library Kit, Swift biosciences (xGen™ ssDNA & Low-Input DNA Library Preparation Kit, IDT). Results. In the KD403 ΔrecB strain with suppressed nucleases, a reduction in primed adaptation was detected, but sequencing revealed no disruption of the 3’ ends of the spacer precursors. Conclusion. Our results contribute to the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of CRISPR adaptation, which may aid in the development of CRISPR-based approaches in medicine and agriculture in the future.

Molecular Genetics Microbiology and Virology (Russian)Vol. 43(4)
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (RU), Kurchatov Institute (RU), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL), Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.