Knowing (Not) to Know: Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Human Metacognition

Many organizations seek to combine human expertise with explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), but they often overlook a core requirement for effective collaboration; humans must understand their own abilities. This understanding of one’s own abilities is referred to as metacognition, which captures how well individuals monitor and regulate their own decision making. In two experiments with real estate and lending professionals, we find that XAI improves human metacognition by reducing their overconfidence. As a result, experts can better delegate decisions to an artificial intelligence (AI) and interact with it more effectively, improving the collaborative performance. These effects occur primarily when XAI highlights differences between human reasoning and AI logic. Our findings demonstrate that metacognition is a key mechanism through which XAI affects decision outcomes and offer guidance for organizations deploying (X)AI under growing transparency and accountability mandates, such as those in the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Systems Research
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2024.1431
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowing (Not) to Know: Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Human Metacognition

Moritz von Zahn, Kevin Bauer, Oliver Hinz, Ekaterina Jussupow et al.
Information Systems Research
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Knowing (Not) to Know: Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Human Metacognition

Moritz von Zahn, Kevin Bauer, Oliver Hinz, Ekaterina Jussupow, Lena Liebich
article en

Abstract

Many organizations seek to combine human expertise with explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), but they often overlook a core requirement for effective collaboration; humans must understand their own abilities. This understanding of one’s own abilities is referred to as metacognition, which captures how well individuals monitor and regulate their own decision making. In two experiments with real estate and lending professionals, we find that XAI improves human metacognition by reducing their overconfidence. As a result, experts can better delegate decisions to an artificial intelligence (AI) and interact with it more effectively, improving the collaborative performance. These effects occur primarily when XAI highlights differences between human reasoning and AI logic. Our findings demonstrate that metacognition is a key mechanism through which XAI affects decision outcomes and offer guidance for organizations deploying (X)AI under growing transparency and accountability mandates, such as those in the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act.

Information Systems Research
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE), Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.