Impact of a Medical–Government Conflict on Healthcare Workers’ Mental Health in a Single Tertiary Hospital

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> A medical-government conflict in South Korea in 2024 led to the collective resignation of resident physicians, causing severe workforce shortages in tertiary hospitals. This study aimed to investigate temporal changes in stress, anxiety, and depression among healthcare workers during this conflict following the COVID-19 pandemic. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study analyzed data from 56,137 adults who completed validated questionnaires on stress (KNHANES), anxiety (Clinically Useful Anxiety Outcome Scale, CUXOS), and depression (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, CES-D) between January 2019 and February 2025 at Samsung Changwon Hospital. Temporal trends were assessed using linear mixed-effects models adjusted for demographic variables. <b>Results:</b> Among attending physicians, stress increased by 1.44 points in the post-COVID period (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and 1.17 points during the conflict (<i>p</i> = 0.006), while anxiety increased by 1.25 (<i>p</i> = 0.012) and 1.36 points (<i>p</i> = 0.013), respectively. The most vulnerable subgroups were women, those aged 30-40 years, and physicians with <5 years of service. Depression increased significantly among physicians in their 40s during the post-COVID period (<i>p</i> = 0.018). Nurses demonstrated a significant reduction in stress during the conflict (-0.91, <i>p</i> = 0.002), possibly reflecting a temporary decrease in direct clinical workload, whereas office workers showed continuous increases in depression (+1.66 post-COVID, <i>p</i> = 0.003; +1.74 conflict, <i>p</i> = 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> The psychological effects of systemic crises differed by occupation. Attending physicians, who bore the greatest clinical and organizational burden, experienced persistent psychological strain during the medical-government conflict following post-pandemic stress. Tailored, occupation-specific strategies are required to protect healthcare workers' mental health during future systemic disruptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238580
Primary Topic
Workplace Violence and Bullying
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of a Medical–Government Conflict on Healthcare Workers’ Mental Health in a Single Tertiary Hospital

Yechan Kyung
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Workplace Violence and Bullying
article

Impact of a Medical–Government Conflict on Healthcare Workers’ Mental Health in a Single Tertiary Hospital

Yechan Kyung
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> A medical-government conflict in South Korea in 2024 led to the collective resignation of resident physicians, causing severe workforce shortages in tertiary hospitals. This study aimed to investigate temporal changes in stress, anxiety, and depression among healthcare workers during this conflict following the COVID-19 pandemic. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study analyzed data from 56,137 adults who completed validated questionnaires on stress (KNHANES), anxiety (Clinically Useful Anxiety Outcome Scale, CUXOS), and depression (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, CES-D) between January 2019 and February 2025 at Samsung Changwon Hospital. Temporal trends were assessed using linear mixed-effects models adjusted for demographic variables. <b>Results:</b> Among attending physicians, stress increased by 1.44 points in the post-COVID period (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and 1.17 points during the conflict (<i>p</i> = 0.006), while anxiety increased by 1.25 (<i>p</i> = 0.012) and 1.36 points (<i>p</i> = 0.013), respectively. The most vulnerable subgroups were women, those aged 30-40 years, and physicians with <5 years of service. Depression increased significantly among physicians in their 40s during the post-COVID period (<i>p</i> = 0.018). Nurses demonstrated a significant reduction in stress during the conflict (-0.91, <i>p</i> = 0.002), possibly reflecting a temporary decrease in direct clinical workload, whereas office workers showed continuous increases in depression (+1.66 post-COVID, <i>p</i> = 0.003; +1.74 conflict, <i>p</i> = 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> The psychological effects of systemic crises differed by occupation. Attending physicians, who bore the greatest clinical and organizational burden, experienced persistent psychological strain during the medical-government conflict following post-pandemic stress. Tailored, occupation-specific strategies are required to protect healthcare workers' mental health during future systemic disruptions.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(23)
Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Workplace Violence and Bullying
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.