Associations Between Anteroposterior Occlusal Class, Musculoskeletal Pain Patterns, and Temporomandibular Disorders in Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

<b>Background:</b> The relationship between sagittal malocclusion, temporomandibular disorders (TMD), and musculoskeletal pain remains uncertain. <b>Methods:</b> Cross-sectional study (April 2020-August 2021) in Małopolska, Poland. Ninety participants (ages 19-35) were classified into Angle Classes I-III (n = 30 each) and examined using RDC/TMD (Axis I/II). A proprietary, nonvalidated, piloted whole-body pain-map questionnaire, presented in anterior and posterior views and subdividing the body into predefined craniofacial, spinal, and limb regions, was used to capture pain presence, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) scores by region, and the total number of painful sites. Group differences were analyzed using χ<sup>2</sup> and Kruskal-Wallis tests with corresponding effect sizes (measures of association strength). For NRS outcomes, a minimal clinically important difference (MCID)-defined as the smallest difference in NRS considered clinically relevant-was prespecified as approximately 1 point. <b>Results:</b> Occlusal class was not associated with TMD Axis I prevalence. However, sagittal malocclusion-particularly Class III-was linked to a less favorable pain profile. Left temporal pain was more frequent in Class III than in Classes I-II (<i>p</i> = 0.024, Cramér's V = 0.31, medium effect), and cervical spine pain occurred more often in malocclusion groups than in Class I (<i>p</i> = 0.043, Cramér's V = 0.26, small effect), indicating statistically significant associations. Cervical pain intensity was higher in Classes II-III than in Class I, with a pooled mean difference-defined as the difference in mean NRS between the combined Classes II-III and Class I-of 1.23 NRS points (95% CI 0.38-2.08), exceeding the ≈1-point MCID and suggesting a clinically important burden. The total number of painful sites was also greater in Class III than in Class I (<i>p</i> = 0.023, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.09; Δ = 1.40 sites, 95% CI 0.39-2.41), which indicates a statistically significant association with a medium effect size and a higher overall pain burden. <b>Conclusions</b>: Sagittal occlusal class was not associated with TMD diagnosis, but malocclusion-especially Class III-was associated with a more unfavorable craniofacial pain pattern and higher cervical pain burden (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05), with effects of potential clinical relevance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238606
Primary Topic
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations Between Anteroposterior Occlusal Class, Musculoskeletal Pain Patterns, and Temporomandibular Disorders in Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

Aneta Wieczorek, Monika Nowak, Joanna Golec, Jędrzej Golec
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
article

Associations Between Anteroposterior Occlusal Class, Musculoskeletal Pain Patterns, and Temporomandibular Disorders in Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

Aneta Wieczorek, Monika Nowak, Joanna Golec, Jędrzej Golec
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> The relationship between sagittal malocclusion, temporomandibular disorders (TMD), and musculoskeletal pain remains uncertain. <b>Methods:</b> Cross-sectional study (April 2020-August 2021) in Małopolska, Poland. Ninety participants (ages 19-35) were classified into Angle Classes I-III (n = 30 each) and examined using RDC/TMD (Axis I/II). A proprietary, nonvalidated, piloted whole-body pain-map questionnaire, presented in anterior and posterior views and subdividing the body into predefined craniofacial, spinal, and limb regions, was used to capture pain presence, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) scores by region, and the total number of painful sites. Group differences were analyzed using χ<sup>2</sup> and Kruskal-Wallis tests with corresponding effect sizes (measures of association strength). For NRS outcomes, a minimal clinically important difference (MCID)-defined as the smallest difference in NRS considered clinically relevant-was prespecified as approximately 1 point. <b>Results:</b> Occlusal class was not associated with TMD Axis I prevalence. However, sagittal malocclusion-particularly Class III-was linked to a less favorable pain profile. Left temporal pain was more frequent in Class III than in Classes I-II (<i>p</i> = 0.024, Cramér's V = 0.31, medium effect), and cervical spine pain occurred more often in malocclusion groups than in Class I (<i>p</i> = 0.043, Cramér's V = 0.26, small effect), indicating statistically significant associations. Cervical pain intensity was higher in Classes II-III than in Class I, with a pooled mean difference-defined as the difference in mean NRS between the combined Classes II-III and Class I-of 1.23 NRS points (95% CI 0.38-2.08), exceeding the ≈1-point MCID and suggesting a clinically important burden. The total number of painful sites was also greater in Class III than in Class I (<i>p</i> = 0.023, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.09; Δ = 1.40 sites, 95% CI 0.39-2.41), which indicates a statistically significant association with a medium effect size and a higher overall pain burden. <b>Conclusions</b>: Sagittal occlusal class was not associated with TMD diagnosis, but malocclusion-especially Class III-was associated with a more unfavorable craniofacial pain pattern and higher cervical pain burden (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05), with effects of potential clinical relevance.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(23)
Jagiellonian University (PL), University School of Physical Education in Kraków (PL), Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University (PL), Krakow Cardiovascular Research Institute (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.