Multiplex PCR in Donor and Recipient Bronchoalveolar Lavage to Guide Early Antibiotic Prophylaxis Adaptation in Lung Transplantation: A Single-Center Cohort Study

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: International guidelines recommend the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for lung transplantation (LT). Although multiplex PCR (mPCR) has been shown to hasten antibiotic adaptation during pneumonia, its use to guide antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing LT has not been described. We aimed to determine whether mPCR in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in donor and recipient allows the early adaptation of antibiotic prophylaxis during LT. <b>Methods</b>: a retrospective, single-center study to evaluate the proportion of patients for whom mPCR (FilmArray Pneumonia Plus Panel<sup>®</sup>, Biomérieux (FAPP)) in the donor and recipient BAL resulted in an early modification of antibiotic prophylaxis. We also compared the time to results using mPCR and standard microbiology and the time spent with inadequate antibiotic prophylaxis. <b>Results</b>: Forty-one patients were included. Donor and recipient mPCR resulted in the early adaptation of antibiotic prophylaxis in 10 (24%) patients. Standard microbiology confirmed the results of mPCR in 90% of them. FAPP resulted in an antibiotic escalation based on donor (9/10) or recipient (1/10) BAL identification, mainly Group 3 Enterobacterales and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli. The time to results was 1.7 (1.5-2.4) h for mPCR vs. 74.3 (41.5-92.7) h for standard microbiology (<i>p</i> < 0.001) on donor BAL and 1.7 (1.5-2.4) h vs. 92.8 (48.4-112.9) h (<i>p</i> < 0.001) on recipient BAL. Patients with mPCR-based adaptation had a 71.9 (30.7-92.1) h reduction in the duration of inadequate antibiotic prophylaxis. <b>Conclusions</b>: mPCR in donor and recipient BAL during LT might lead to faster adaptation and a reduction in the time spent with inadequate antibiotic prophylaxis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238613
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiplex PCR in Donor and Recipient Bronchoalveolar Lavage to Guide Early Antibiotic Prophylaxis Adaptation in Lung Transplantation: A Single-Center Cohort Study

Christophe Guervilly, Benjamin Coiffard, Jean-Marie Forel, Xavier Benoît D’Journo et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Multiplex PCR in Donor and Recipient Bronchoalveolar Lavage to Guide Early Antibiotic Prophylaxis Adaptation in Lung Transplantation: A Single-Center Cohort Study

Christophe Guervilly, Benjamin Coiffard, Jean-Marie Forel, Xavier Benoît D’Journo, Florence Daviet, Geoffrey Brioude, Geoffray Agard, Marc Léone, Pierre Mora, Alban Todesco, Sami Hraiech, Damien Barrau, Erwan Mesdon
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: International guidelines recommend the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for lung transplantation (LT). Although multiplex PCR (mPCR) has been shown to hasten antibiotic adaptation during pneumonia, its use to guide antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing LT has not been described. We aimed to determine whether mPCR in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in donor and recipient allows the early adaptation of antibiotic prophylaxis during LT. <b>Methods</b>: a retrospective, single-center study to evaluate the proportion of patients for whom mPCR (FilmArray Pneumonia Plus Panel<sup>®</sup>, Biomérieux (FAPP)) in the donor and recipient BAL resulted in an early modification of antibiotic prophylaxis. We also compared the time to results using mPCR and standard microbiology and the time spent with inadequate antibiotic prophylaxis. <b>Results</b>: Forty-one patients were included. Donor and recipient mPCR resulted in the early adaptation of antibiotic prophylaxis in 10 (24%) patients. Standard microbiology confirmed the results of mPCR in 90% of them. FAPP resulted in an antibiotic escalation based on donor (9/10) or recipient (1/10) BAL identification, mainly Group 3 Enterobacterales and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli. The time to results was 1.7 (1.5-2.4) h for mPCR vs. 74.3 (41.5-92.7) h for standard microbiology (<i>p</i> < 0.001) on donor BAL and 1.7 (1.5-2.4) h vs. 92.8 (48.4-112.9) h (<i>p</i> < 0.001) on recipient BAL. Patients with mPCR-based adaptation had a 71.9 (30.7-92.1) h reduction in the duration of inadequate antibiotic prophylaxis. <b>Conclusions</b>: mPCR in donor and recipient BAL during LT might lead to faster adaptation and a reduction in the time spent with inadequate antibiotic prophylaxis.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(23)
Hôpital Nord (FR), Centre d'Études et de Recherches sur les Qualifications (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.