Contrasts between Electrophysical Properties in a Sandy–Clay Section and Their GPR Reflections

Discrepancies in the depth of lithological boundaries with contrasts of electromagnetic properties of sediments were found in a sandy–clayey section. As a result, the reflections on ground penetrating radar (GPR) data differ in depth from the lithological boundaries, thus complicating the geological interpretation. A forward problem was solved using a model constructed from the measured electromagnetic properties. The modeling results allowed reasonable correlation of the GPR reflections with lithological boundaries and explain their discrepancies at depth. The geological interpretation of the GPR data was thus refined.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Moscow University Geology Bulletin
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3103/s0145875225700838
Primary Topic
Geophysical Methods and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrasts between Electrophysical Properties in a Sandy–Clay Section and Their GPR Reflections

М. Л. Владов, С. С. Бричева, M. A. Tarasova
Moscow University Geology Bulletin
Geophysical Methods and Applications
article

Contrasts between Electrophysical Properties in a Sandy–Clay Section and Their GPR Reflections

М. Л. Владов, С. С. Бричева, M. A. Tarasova
article en

Abstract

Discrepancies in the depth of lithological boundaries with contrasts of electromagnetic properties of sediments were found in a sandy–clayey section. As a result, the reflections on ground penetrating radar (GPR) data differ in depth from the lithological boundaries, thus complicating the geological interpretation. A forward problem was solved using a model constructed from the measured electromagnetic properties. The modeling results allowed reasonable correlation of the GPR reflections with lithological boundaries and explain their discrepancies at depth. The geological interpretation of the GPR data was thus refined.

Moscow University Geology BulletinVol. 80(5)
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Institute of Geography (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Geophysical Methods and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.