The evolving landscape of AI-driven risk management in the biogas production: A systematic and bibliometric review

• First combined systematic + bibliometric review on AI-risk in biogas systems. • Maps global trends (2015–2025) in AI-driven risk management at WWTPs. • Identifies research clusters linking AI, safety, and circular-economy goals. • Highlights transferable AI practices from oil & gas to waste-to-energy plants. • Proposes XAI-based framework to enhance transparency and risk governance. This review presents the first combined systematic and bibliometric review synthesising artificial intelligence (AI)-driven approaches to risk management in biogas production within wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), with emphasis on decision-optimisation and operational safety. Seven academic databases: Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Taylor & Francis, and Google Scholar were systematically searched from 2015 to March 2025, and screening followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Of 3,716 retrieved records, 109 studies met the inclusion criteria. Bibliometric mapping (VOSviewer) and qualitative synthesis identified five thematic clusters: (i) biogas process safety, (ii) IoT integration and renewable-energy, (iii) optimisation and supply-chain resilience, (iv) AI-driven decision-support frameworks, and (v) advanced machine-learning techniques. The analysis reveals a marked increase in publications since 2020, reflecting a shift from conceptual modelling toward applied digital risk solutions. Europe and China remain leading contributors, although collaboration networks are fragmented and methodological heterogeneity persists. Full-scale validation of AI models in operational WWTP-based biogas plants remains limited, with most studies relying on laboratory experiments, simulations, or pilot-scale data. Constraints include publication bias, database coverage, English-language restrictions, inconsistent performance metrics, and limited access to long-term Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Systems datasets. The review demonstrates that AI-driven methods have significant potential to improve safety, operational efficiency, and regulatory assurance in biogas facilities. However, achieving practical and scalable implementation will require rigorous multi-site validation, standardised evaluation indicators, integration of explainable AI, and alignment with plant-level risk-governance frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Waste Management Bulletin
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wmb.2025.100271
Primary Topic
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The evolving landscape of AI-driven risk management in the biogas production: A systematic and bibliometric review

Oleksiy V. Klymenko, M.K.S. Al-Mhdawi, Michael Short, Nor Kamaliana Khamis et al.
Waste Management Bulletin
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
article

The evolving landscape of AI-driven risk management in the biogas production: A systematic and bibliometric review

Oleksiy V. Klymenko, M.K.S. Al-Mhdawi, Michael Short, Nor Kamaliana Khamis, A.F. Sakr, Mohamed Abourida, Charf Mahammedi
article en

Abstract

• First combined systematic + bibliometric review on AI-risk in biogas systems. • Maps global trends (2015–2025) in AI-driven risk management at WWTPs. • Identifies research clusters linking AI, safety, and circular-economy goals. • Highlights transferable AI practices from oil & gas to waste-to-energy plants. • Proposes XAI-based framework to enhance transparency and risk governance. This review presents the first combined systematic and bibliometric review synthesising artificial intelligence (AI)-driven approaches to risk management in biogas production within wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), with emphasis on decision-optimisation and operational safety. Seven academic databases: Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Taylor & Francis, and Google Scholar were systematically searched from 2015 to March 2025, and screening followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Of 3,716 retrieved records, 109 studies met the inclusion criteria. Bibliometric mapping (VOSviewer) and qualitative synthesis identified five thematic clusters: (i) biogas process safety, (ii) IoT integration and renewable-energy, (iii) optimisation and supply-chain resilience, (iv) AI-driven decision-support frameworks, and (v) advanced machine-learning techniques. The analysis reveals a marked increase in publications since 2020, reflecting a shift from conceptual modelling toward applied digital risk solutions. Europe and China remain leading contributors, although collaboration networks are fragmented and methodological heterogeneity persists. Full-scale validation of AI models in operational WWTP-based biogas plants remains limited, with most studies relying on laboratory experiments, simulations, or pilot-scale data. Constraints include publication bias, database coverage, English-language restrictions, inconsistent performance metrics, and limited access to long-term Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Systems datasets. The review demonstrates that AI-driven methods have significant potential to improve safety, operational efficiency, and regulatory assurance in biogas facilities. However, achieving practical and scalable implementation will require rigorous multi-site validation, standardised evaluation indicators, integration of explainable AI, and alignment with plant-level risk-governance frameworks.

Waste Management BulletinVol. 4(1)
Damanhour University (EG), University of Surrey (GB), Institute for Sustainability (GB), Alexandria University (EG), Teesside University (GB)
Teesside University
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.