The efficient stored specimen design for evaluating multiple screening technologies: Application to multicancer detection tests

ObjectiveMulticancer detection (MCD) tests use blood specimens to screen for various cancers with the hope of reducing cancer mortality. Various companies are developing MCD tests, each with a different technology. For evaluating <i>k</i> MCD tests, a traditional design randomizes participants to either a group with no MCD testing or one of <i>k</i> groups each receiving a different immediate (administered at blood draw) MCD test. To reduce sample size, investigators can store some specimens for delayed MCD testing. A standard stored specimen (SSS) design randomizes participants to either a control group with <i>k</i> different delayed MCD tests applied to the same stored specimen or one of <i>k</i> groups each receiving a different immediate MCD test. Our goal was to further increase efficiency via a novel design and analysis.MethodsThe efficient stored specimen (ESS) design randomizes participants to delayed MCD testing, as in the SSS design, or a single group with <i>k</i> different immediate MCD tests applied to the same specimen. We developed a simple method to separately evaluate each MCD test when any positive MCD test yields a work-up.ResultsThe sample size per randomization group is the same for the ESS and SSS designs. For evaluating <i>k</i> MCD tests, the ESS design involves 2 randomization groups while the SSS design involves <i>k</i> + 1 randomization groups of the same size.ConclusionThe ESS design is superior to the SSS design because, without additional assumptions, it substantially reduces sample size when evaluating multiple MCD tests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Screening
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413251405105
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The efficient stored specimen design for evaluating multiple screening technologies: Application to multicancer detection tests

Stuart G. Baker, Hormuzd A. Katki
Journal of Medical Screening
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

The efficient stored specimen design for evaluating multiple screening technologies: Application to multicancer detection tests

Stuart G. Baker, Hormuzd A. Katki
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveMulticancer detection (MCD) tests use blood specimens to screen for various cancers with the hope of reducing cancer mortality. Various companies are developing MCD tests, each with a different technology. For evaluating <i>k</i> MCD tests, a traditional design randomizes participants to either a group with no MCD testing or one of <i>k</i> groups each receiving a different immediate (administered at blood draw) MCD test. To reduce sample size, investigators can store some specimens for delayed MCD testing. A standard stored specimen (SSS) design randomizes participants to either a control group with <i>k</i> different delayed MCD tests applied to the same stored specimen or one of <i>k</i> groups each receiving a different immediate MCD test. Our goal was to further increase efficiency via a novel design and analysis.MethodsThe efficient stored specimen (ESS) design randomizes participants to delayed MCD testing, as in the SSS design, or a single group with <i>k</i> different immediate MCD tests applied to the same specimen. We developed a simple method to separately evaluate each MCD test when any positive MCD test yields a work-up.ResultsThe sample size per randomization group is the same for the ESS and SSS designs. For evaluating <i>k</i> MCD tests, the ESS design involves 2 randomization groups while the SSS design involves <i>k</i> + 1 randomization groups of the same size.ConclusionThe ESS design is superior to the SSS design because, without additional assumptions, it substantially reduces sample size when evaluating multiple MCD tests.

Journal of Medical Screening
American Cancer Society (US), Independent Sector (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The efficient stored specimen design for evaluating multiple screening technologies: Application to multicancer detection tests — Stuart G. Baker, Hormuzd A. Katki · Journal of Medical Screening (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS