Multi-Task Deep Learning for Surface Metrology

A reproducible deep learning framework is presented for surface metrology to predict surface texture parameters together with their reported standard uncertainties. Using a multi-instrument dataset spanning tactile and optical systems, we jointly address measurement system type classification and regression of key surface parameters-arithmetic mean roughness (Ra), mean peak-to-valley roughness (Rz), and total roundness deviation (RONt)-alongside their reported standard uncertainties. Uncertainty is modelled via quantile and heteroscedastic regression heads, with post hoc conformal calibration used to obtain calibrated prediction intervals. On a held-out test set, high fidelity was achieved by single-target regressors (coefficients of determination: Ra 0.9824, Rz 0.9847, RONt 0.9918), with two uncertainty targets also well modelled (standard uncertainty of Ra 0.9899, standard uncertainty of Rz 0.9955); the standard uncertainty of RONt remained more difficult to learn (0.4934). The classifier reached 92.85% accuracy, and probability calibration was essentially unchanged after temperature scaling (expected calibration error 0.00504 → 0.00503 on the test split). Negative transfer was observed for naive multi-output trunks, with single-target models performing better. These results provide calibrated predictions suitable for informing instrument selection and acceptance decisions in metrological workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25247471
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-Task Deep Learning for Surface Metrology

Michał Wieczorowski, Adam Gąska, P. Sosinowski, Krzysztof Stępień et al.
1 citations
Sensors
Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
1.33
article

Multi-Task Deep Learning for Surface Metrology

Michał Wieczorowski, Adam Gąska, P. Sosinowski, Krzysztof Stępień, Michał Nawotka, Marta Rępalska, Adam Wójtowicz, Bartosz Gapiński, D. Kucharski, Piotr Sobecki, Tomasz Kowaluk
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A reproducible deep learning framework is presented for surface metrology to predict surface texture parameters together with their reported standard uncertainties. Using a multi-instrument dataset spanning tactile and optical systems, we jointly address measurement system type classification and regression of key surface parameters-arithmetic mean roughness (Ra), mean peak-to-valley roughness (Rz), and total roundness deviation (RONt)-alongside their reported standard uncertainties. Uncertainty is modelled via quantile and heteroscedastic regression heads, with post hoc conformal calibration used to obtain calibrated prediction intervals. On a held-out test set, high fidelity was achieved by single-target regressors (coefficients of determination: Ra 0.9824, Rz 0.9847, RONt 0.9918), with two uncertainty targets also well modelled (standard uncertainty of Ra 0.9899, standard uncertainty of Rz 0.9955); the standard uncertainty of RONt remained more difficult to learn (0.4934). The classifier reached 92.85% accuracy, and probability calibration was essentially unchanged after temperature scaling (expected calibration error 0.00504 → 0.00503 on the test split). Negative transfer was observed for naive multi-output trunks, with single-target models performing better. These results provide calibrated predictions suitable for informing instrument selection and acceptance decisions in metrological workflows.

SensorsVol. 25(24)
Warsaw University of Technology (PL), Kielce University of Technology (PL), Cracow University of Technology (PL), National Information Processing Institute (PL), Central Office of Measures (PL), Poznań University of Technology (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.