Toward Low-Carbon Power Systems: Reviewing Life Cycle Carbon Footprints of Diverse Generation Pathways

Electricity generation is the largest contributor to anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This review synthesizes life cycle assessment (LCA) evidence for major power generation technologies published from 2015 to 2025. Using a structured screening approach, it identifies consistent cross-technology patterns and the methodological factors driving variation in reported results. Unabated coal and oil show the highest life cycle intensities; natural gas varies widely with methane management; and nuclear, geothermal, hydropower, wind, and solar power generally fall one to two orders of magnitude lower. Differences arise mainly from upstream processes, siting conditions, and system boundary definitions. Key mitigation levers include plant efficiency improvements, methane abatement, carbon capture and storage (CCS), and low-carbon manufacturing. The review also highlights how emerging policies—including the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and China’s carbon-footprint standards—are integrating life cycle and Scope-2 accounting. Standardized, AR6-aligned LCA practices and transparent upstream data remain essential for credible, comparable electricity-sector decarbonization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18246413
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward Low-Carbon Power Systems: Reviewing Life Cycle Carbon Footprints of Diverse Generation Pathways

Guiyuan Xue, Wenjuan Niu, Yin Wu, Xu Wang et al.
1 citations
Energies
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
0.82
article

Toward Low-Carbon Power Systems: Reviewing Life Cycle Carbon Footprints of Diverse Generation Pathways

Guiyuan Xue, Wenjuan Niu, Yin Wu, Xu Wang, Guo Li, Jian Tan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Electricity generation is the largest contributor to anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This review synthesizes life cycle assessment (LCA) evidence for major power generation technologies published from 2015 to 2025. Using a structured screening approach, it identifies consistent cross-technology patterns and the methodological factors driving variation in reported results. Unabated coal and oil show the highest life cycle intensities; natural gas varies widely with methane management; and nuclear, geothermal, hydropower, wind, and solar power generally fall one to two orders of magnitude lower. Differences arise mainly from upstream processes, siting conditions, and system boundary definitions. Key mitigation levers include plant efficiency improvements, methane abatement, carbon capture and storage (CCS), and low-carbon manufacturing. The review also highlights how emerging policies—including the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and China’s carbon-footprint standards—are integrating life cycle and Scope-2 accounting. Standardized, AR6-aligned LCA practices and transparent upstream data remain essential for credible, comparable electricity-sector decarbonization.

EnergiesVol. 18(24)
Economic Research Institute (BG)
State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Toward Low-Carbon Power Systems: Reviewing Life Cycle Carbon Footprints of Diverse Generation Pathways — Guiyuan Xue, Wenjuan Niu, et al. · Energies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS