In defense of the double empathy problem hypothesis: An urgently needed alternative to fallacies and injustices in mainstream autism research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Review
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000605
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In defense of the double empathy problem hypothesis: An urgently needed alternative to fallacies and injustices in mainstream autism research.

Caroline Bollen, Janna van Grunsven
1 citations
Psychological Review
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
1.43
article

In defense of the double empathy problem hypothesis: An urgently needed alternative to fallacies and injustices in mainstream autism research.

Caroline Bollen, Janna van Grunsven
article en
1 citations

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Psychological ReviewVol. 133(2)
Human Computer Interaction (Switzerland) (CH), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
1.43
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

In defense of the double empathy problem hypothesis: An urgently needed alternative to fallacies and injustices in mainstream autism research. — Caroline Bollen, Janna van Grunsven · Psychological Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS