Exploring the digital landscape: A scoping review of Achilles tendinopathy education on public websites and in randomised controlled trials

ObjectivesThe aims of this scoping review were to (i) map education from randomised controlled trials and public websites for Achilles tendinopathy to pre-defined categories and (ii) appraise the quality of education available.Data sourcesSources were extracted via a search of multiple databases and from the first three pages of targeted Google searches in English, Chinese, and Spanish (websites).Review methodsThe frequency of sources that reported on each pre-defined category (n = 15) was reported, and the content within each category was summarised descriptively. Quality and reliability were assessed with the DISCERN tool (1-5 points, higher score means higher quality and trustworthiness). Understandability and actionability of education was assessed using Patient Education Materials Assessment tool (0-100%, higher scores indicate more comprehensible information with clearer messages and more identifiable actions). Alignment with current international guidelines was reported.Results119 randomised controlled trials and 385 websites were included. Education coverage was better in websites compared to trials, particularly related to pathology and management. Conflicting advice was found on websites (e.g. when treatment should be sought). Quality (1.6 ± 0.5) and reliability (2.1 ± 0.7) of education were poor, with low scores for treatment risks and shared decision-making. Understandability was moderate (59%) and actionability was poor (28%). Alignment with clinical guidelines was low, with key information commonly omitted.ConclusionEducational sources found in randomised controlled trials and public websites on Achilles tendinopathy are poorly aligned with clinical guidelines. The information gaps in these sources mean that they are unhelpful to patients and may steer them towards inappropriate decisions. The review highlights the need for the development of accurate, meaningful, and evidence-based educational resources for individuals with Achilles tendinopathy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Rehabilitation
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251397620
Primary Topic
Tendon Structure and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the digital landscape: A scoping review of Achilles tendinopathy education on public websites and in randomised controlled trials

Jie Jiang, Robert‐Jan de Vos, Timothy R. Fleagle, Igor Sancho et al.
Clinical Rehabilitation
Tendon Structure and Treatment
article

Exploring the digital landscape: A scoping review of Achilles tendinopathy education on public websites and in randomised controlled trials

Jie Jiang, Robert‐Jan de Vos, Timothy R. Fleagle, Igor Sancho, Peter Malliaras, Morgan N. Potter, Ruth L. Chimenti, Shivam Sharma, Jie Deng, Adrian Mallows, Karin Grävare Silbernagel, Hayley Powell Smitheman, Sanam Tavakkoli Oskouei, Peter Nicklen, Diego Ruffino, Jaryd Bourke, Wenbo Chen, Sean McAullife
article en

Abstract

ObjectivesThe aims of this scoping review were to (i) map education from randomised controlled trials and public websites for Achilles tendinopathy to pre-defined categories and (ii) appraise the quality of education available.Data sourcesSources were extracted via a search of multiple databases and from the first three pages of targeted Google searches in English, Chinese, and Spanish (websites).Review methodsThe frequency of sources that reported on each pre-defined category (n = 15) was reported, and the content within each category was summarised descriptively. Quality and reliability were assessed with the DISCERN tool (1-5 points, higher score means higher quality and trustworthiness). Understandability and actionability of education was assessed using Patient Education Materials Assessment tool (0-100%, higher scores indicate more comprehensible information with clearer messages and more identifiable actions). Alignment with current international guidelines was reported.Results119 randomised controlled trials and 385 websites were included. Education coverage was better in websites compared to trials, particularly related to pathology and management. Conflicting advice was found on websites (e.g. when treatment should be sought). Quality (1.6 ± 0.5) and reliability (2.1 ± 0.7) of education were poor, with low scores for treatment risks and shared decision-making. Understandability was moderate (59%) and actionability was poor (28%). Alignment with clinical guidelines was low, with key information commonly omitted.ConclusionEducational sources found in randomised controlled trials and public websites on Achilles tendinopathy are poorly aligned with clinical guidelines. The information gaps in these sources mean that they are unhelpful to patients and may steer them towards inappropriate decisions. The review highlights the need for the development of accurate, meaningful, and evidence-based educational resources for individuals with Achilles tendinopathy.

Clinical RehabilitationVol. 40(4)
Chandigarh University (IN), University of Essex (GB), University of Iowa (US), Universidad de Deusto (ES), Guru Nanak Dev University (IN), Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (AR), University of Limerick (IE), Erasmus MC (NL), Monash Health (AU), Huashan Hospital (CN), Monash University (AU), Neuroscience Research Australia (AU), University of Delaware (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Tendon Structure and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.