Strategising imaginaries: How corporate actors in China, Germany and the US shape AI governance

Corporate actors have been actively shaping the normative framing and socio-material infrastructure related to AI governance. We show how they achieve this by analysing documents from corporate actors headquartered in China, Germany and the US from 2017 to 2023, a pivotal period in the formation of public understanding of the topic. Drawing on conceptual work around ‘socio-technical imaginaries’ and corporate strategic behaviours, the analysis identifies ‘hedging’ imaginaries such as ‘Responsible AI’, ‘Trustworthy AI’ and ‘AI for Good’ through communication and stakeholder-networking as a key strategy used by corporate actors to negotiate socio-political differences and navigate regulatory pressure in their interests. In doing so, we highlight the need for critical reflection on current AI governance discourse in relation to public imagination and the making of future socio-technical orders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Big Data & Society
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517251400727
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategising imaginaries: How corporate actors in China, Germany and the US shape AI governance

Christian Katzenbach, Yishu Mao, Vanessa Richter
Big Data & Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Strategising imaginaries: How corporate actors in China, Germany and the US shape AI governance

Christian Katzenbach, Yishu Mao, Vanessa Richter
article en

Abstract

Corporate actors have been actively shaping the normative framing and socio-material infrastructure related to AI governance. We show how they achieve this by analysing documents from corporate actors headquartered in China, Germany and the US from 2017 to 2023, a pivotal period in the formation of public understanding of the topic. Drawing on conceptual work around ‘socio-technical imaginaries’ and corporate strategic behaviours, the analysis identifies ‘hedging’ imaginaries such as ‘Responsible AI’, ‘Trustworthy AI’ and ‘AI for Good’ through communication and stakeholder-networking as a key strategy used by corporate actors to negotiate socio-political differences and navigate regulatory pressure in their interests. In doing so, we highlight the need for critical reflection on current AI governance discourse in relation to public imagination and the making of future socio-technical orders.

Big Data & SocietyVol. 12(4)
University of Bremen (DE), University of Zurich (CH), Max Planck Institute for the History of Science (DE), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.