RCEP’s Environmental Co-Benefits: A Net Impact Assessment of NO2 Emissions from China-ASEAN Green Agri-Trade

The environmental impact of trade liberalization hinges on a central tension between its ‘scale effect’ and its ‘technique and composition effects’. This study uses the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership’s (RCEP) influence on China-ASEAN green agricultural trade as a quasi-natural experiment to test the net outcome of this conflict. Leveraging panel data from 2003–2023 and a combined Difference-in-Differences (DID) and Instrumental Variables (IV) methodology, we find that while RCEP-driven agricultural expansion (the scale effect) did significantly increase NO2 emissions by 21.80 units (p = 0.011), the total effect of RCEP was counter-intuitively and significantly negative. The agreement produced a context-specific environmental co-benefit, achieving a net reduction of 99.45 μmol/m2 of NO2 (p = 0.008). The agreement produced a specific reduction in combustion-related air pollution, achieving a net reduction of 99.45 μmol/m2 of NO2 (p = 0.008). We caution that this outcome is contextual: it is driven not only by a still-weak green technology effect (a 0.55 unit reduction, p = 0.095) but more critically by a structural shift in trade towards lower-emission fruit and vegetable products (coefficient = −0.13, p = 0.077), suggesting that environmental gains are currently contingent on product composition rather than broad decarbonization. This reveals that environmental pressures from scale are, for now, being offset by structural optimization, highlighting the urgent need for refined emission monitoring and targeted green policies within RCEP to solidify these environmental gains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su172410966
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RCEP’s Environmental Co-Benefits: A Net Impact Assessment of NO2 Emissions from China-ASEAN Green Agri-Trade

Hanqi Wang, Yuanguan Gao, Wang XingJian, Yifu Yang et al.
Sustainability
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

RCEP’s Environmental Co-Benefits: A Net Impact Assessment of NO2 Emissions from China-ASEAN Green Agri-Trade

Hanqi Wang, Yuanguan Gao, Wang XingJian, Yifu Yang, Ya Wang, Meng Xu
article en

Abstract

The environmental impact of trade liberalization hinges on a central tension between its ‘scale effect’ and its ‘technique and composition effects’. This study uses the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership’s (RCEP) influence on China-ASEAN green agricultural trade as a quasi-natural experiment to test the net outcome of this conflict. Leveraging panel data from 2003–2023 and a combined Difference-in-Differences (DID) and Instrumental Variables (IV) methodology, we find that while RCEP-driven agricultural expansion (the scale effect) did significantly increase NO2 emissions by 21.80 units (p = 0.011), the total effect of RCEP was counter-intuitively and significantly negative. The agreement produced a context-specific environmental co-benefit, achieving a net reduction of 99.45 μmol/m2 of NO2 (p = 0.008). The agreement produced a specific reduction in combustion-related air pollution, achieving a net reduction of 99.45 μmol/m2 of NO2 (p = 0.008). We caution that this outcome is contextual: it is driven not only by a still-weak green technology effect (a 0.55 unit reduction, p = 0.095) but more critically by a structural shift in trade towards lower-emission fruit and vegetable products (coefficient = −0.13, p = 0.077), suggesting that environmental gains are currently contingent on product composition rather than broad decarbonization. This reveals that environmental pressures from scale are, for now, being offset by structural optimization, highlighting the urgent need for refined emission monitoring and targeted green policies within RCEP to solidify these environmental gains.

SustainabilityVol. 17(24)
Shanghai University (CN), Nanjing University of Finance and Economics (CN), Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (CN), Shanxi University (CN), Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN), China Academy of Railway Sciences (CN), Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.