The Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure on the Firm Value of Non-Financial Firms Listed in South Africa

This study examines the impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosures on the firm valuation of non-financial firms listed in South Africa, using Tobin’s Q as a firm value proxy. Using a panel data approach of 642 firm-year observations from 2017 to 2022, the study applies Fixed Effects, Random Effects, and Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) estimators to address possible endogeneity concerns. The results consistently show that, for the whole sample, ESG disclosures are positively and significantly related to firm value, thus supporting the view that markets reward transparency and sustainability initiatives. Firm size and liquidity also have positive impacts, while financial leverage has an inverse relationship with firm value. Subgroup regression analysis shows significant sectoral differences: ESG disclosure in non-manufacturing companies has a positive and significant relationship with firm value, in line with stakeholder and signaling theories, emphasizing the premium for intangible assets like reputation and trust. However, in manufacturing companies, ESG disclosure is negatively and significantly associated with firm value, implying concerns among investors regarding compliance costs, strategic misalignment, or possible “greenwashing.” The study contributes to the emerging-market literature by (i) introducing a PCA-based ESG index specific to JSE-listed non-financials, (ii) triangulating results across static and dynamic specifications to ensure robustness, and (iii) uncovering sectoral heterogeneity that has been largely overlooked. The research also has practical implications for corporate managers, policymakers, and investors on the alignment of ESG practices to industry attributes for long-term value optimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risks
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13120242
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure on the Firm Value of Non-Financial Firms Listed in South Africa

Thabiso Sthembiso Msomi, Dipakiso Clara Msiza, Michael Akinola Aruwaji
Risks
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

The Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure on the Firm Value of Non-Financial Firms Listed in South Africa

Thabiso Sthembiso Msomi, Dipakiso Clara Msiza, Michael Akinola Aruwaji
article en

Abstract

This study examines the impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosures on the firm valuation of non-financial firms listed in South Africa, using Tobin’s Q as a firm value proxy. Using a panel data approach of 642 firm-year observations from 2017 to 2022, the study applies Fixed Effects, Random Effects, and Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) estimators to address possible endogeneity concerns. The results consistently show that, for the whole sample, ESG disclosures are positively and significantly related to firm value, thus supporting the view that markets reward transparency and sustainability initiatives. Firm size and liquidity also have positive impacts, while financial leverage has an inverse relationship with firm value. Subgroup regression analysis shows significant sectoral differences: ESG disclosure in non-manufacturing companies has a positive and significant relationship with firm value, in line with stakeholder and signaling theories, emphasizing the premium for intangible assets like reputation and trust. However, in manufacturing companies, ESG disclosure is negatively and significantly associated with firm value, implying concerns among investors regarding compliance costs, strategic misalignment, or possible “greenwashing.” The study contributes to the emerging-market literature by (i) introducing a PCA-based ESG index specific to JSE-listed non-financials, (ii) triangulating results across static and dynamic specifications to ensure robustness, and (iii) uncovering sectoral heterogeneity that has been largely overlooked. The research also has practical implications for corporate managers, policymakers, and investors on the alignment of ESG practices to industry attributes for long-term value optimization.

RisksVol. 13(12)
University of South Africa (ZA), Durban University of Technology (ZA), College of Accounting (SI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.