Watchman FLX versus Watchman 2.5 for left atrial appendage closure: a propensity score-matched analysis

In a large dual-centre cohort of consecutive, successful LAAC procedures using two iterations of the Watchman device, the Watchman FLX was associated with significantly lower rates of both DRT and PDL compared to the Watchman 2.5.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EuroIntervention
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4244/eij-d-25-00757
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Watchman FLX versus Watchman 2.5 for left atrial appendage closure: a propensity score-matched analysis

Laurent Roten, Sanghamitra Mohanty, Luigi Di Biase, Nicolas Brugger et al.
EuroIntervention
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Watchman FLX versus Watchman 2.5 for left atrial appendage closure: a propensity score-matched analysis

Laurent Roten, Sanghamitra Mohanty, Luigi Di Biase, Nicolas Brugger, Roberto Galea, Rodney Horton, Carola Gianni, Amin Al‐Ahmad, Tommaso Bini, Domenico Giovanni Della Rocca, Vincenzo Mirco La Fazia, George C.M. Siontis, Prem Geeta Torlapati, Lorenz Räber, Antanas Gasys
article en

Abstract

In a large dual-centre cohort of consecutive, successful LAAC procedures using two iterations of the Watchman device, the Watchman FLX was associated with significantly lower rates of both DRT and PDL compared to the Watchman 2.5.

EuroInterventionVol. 21(24)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), University of Bern (CH), Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), University Hospital of Bern (CH), St David's Medical Center (US), Scripps Clinic (US), Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia (US), MetroHealth Medical Center (US), Spitalzentrum Centre hospitalier Biel- Bienne (CH), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.