Negative expansion resistance (NER) phenomenon predicts hemodynamically non-significant coronary lesions

Revascularization decision for intermediate stenoses necessitates consideration of their hemodynamic impact. We report the use of distal coronary pressure (Pd) above proximal aortic pressure (Pa) during the early expansion period as a visual dichotomous marker (negative expansion resistance, NER) for rapid clinical decision-making. Simultaneous pressure and velocity signals were used to calculate instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), fractional flow reserve (FFR), hyperemic stenosis resistance (hSR), and to identify the NER. NER was defined as the Pd > Pa during the early-expansion period, which refers to early-decompression of coronary circulation marked by pressure decay (dP/dt < 0) coinciding the time-window of reduced ejection phase of systole to early diastole. Classification performance of NER was evaluated against iFR, FFR and hSR. Out of 475 lesions with mean diameter stenosis of 61% ± 16% from 388 patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), 46%(217/475) exhibited the NER-phenomenon. Of these, 96% (209/217) had an iFR above 0.89(NPV = 0.96[95%CI 93-98] PPV = 0.47[95%CI 41-54]) indicating hemodynamically non-significant lesions. 94%(204/217) of the NER( +) lesions had an hSR below 0.80(NPV = 0.94 [95%CI 90-97] PPV = 0.36[95%CI 30-42]), and 88%(191/217) had an FFR above 0.80 (NPV = 0.88[95%CI 83-92] PPV = 0.53[95%CI 46-59]), indicating non-flow limiting lesions. Of 8 lesions with NER despite an abnormal iFR, only 1 had abnormal hSR, whereas 7 had normal hSR. Of 162 lesions with abnormal FFR, iFR identified 53 (33%) as 'normal' whereas NER was present in 26 (16%) of these cases.NER was associated with instantaneously stronger coronary decompression wave(8.0 ± 11.2 vs 5.5 ± 10.1 10.kW.m-2.s<sup>-2</sup> p:0.016) and higher flow acceleration(195 ± 204 vs 106 ± 182 cm.s<sup>-2</sup> p < 0.001). In conclusion, the NER, visually recognized by resting pressure tracings, rules out flow-limiting lesions in CCS with high certainty, offering a simple first-line evaluation for clinical decision-making, and warrants prospective clinical studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-29670-3
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negative expansion resistance (NER) phenomenon predicts hemodynamically non-significant coronary lesions

Tim P. van de Hoef, Jan J. Piek, İbrahim Taş, Kim H. Parker et al.
Scientific Reports
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Negative expansion resistance (NER) phenomenon predicts hemodynamically non-significant coronary lesions

Tim P. van de Hoef, Jan J. Piek, İbrahim Taş, Kim H. Parker, Yaren Alan
article en

Abstract

Revascularization decision for intermediate stenoses necessitates consideration of their hemodynamic impact. We report the use of distal coronary pressure (Pd) above proximal aortic pressure (Pa) during the early expansion period as a visual dichotomous marker (negative expansion resistance, NER) for rapid clinical decision-making. Simultaneous pressure and velocity signals were used to calculate instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), fractional flow reserve (FFR), hyperemic stenosis resistance (hSR), and to identify the NER. NER was defined as the Pd > Pa during the early-expansion period, which refers to early-decompression of coronary circulation marked by pressure decay (dP/dt < 0) coinciding the time-window of reduced ejection phase of systole to early diastole. Classification performance of NER was evaluated against iFR, FFR and hSR. Out of 475 lesions with mean diameter stenosis of 61% ± 16% from 388 patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), 46%(217/475) exhibited the NER-phenomenon. Of these, 96% (209/217) had an iFR above 0.89(NPV = 0.96[95%CI 93-98] PPV = 0.47[95%CI 41-54]) indicating hemodynamically non-significant lesions. 94%(204/217) of the NER( +) lesions had an hSR below 0.80(NPV = 0.94 [95%CI 90-97] PPV = 0.36[95%CI 30-42]), and 88%(191/217) had an FFR above 0.80 (NPV = 0.88[95%CI 83-92] PPV = 0.53[95%CI 46-59]), indicating non-flow limiting lesions. Of 8 lesions with NER despite an abnormal iFR, only 1 had abnormal hSR, whereas 7 had normal hSR. Of 162 lesions with abnormal FFR, iFR identified 53 (33%) as 'normal' whereas NER was present in 26 (16%) of these cases.NER was associated with instantaneously stronger coronary decompression wave(8.0 ± 11.2 vs 5.5 ± 10.1 10.kW.m-2.s<sup>-2</sup> p:0.016) and higher flow acceleration(195 ± 204 vs 106 ± 182 cm.s<sup>-2</sup> p < 0.001). In conclusion, the NER, visually recognized by resting pressure tracings, rules out flow-limiting lesions in CCS with high certainty, offering a simple first-line evaluation for clinical decision-making, and warrants prospective clinical studies.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Balıkesir University (TR), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Acıbadem University (TR), Sivas State Hospital (TR), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Acıbadem Kadıköy Hospital (TR), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Imperial College London (GB), Istanbul University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.