Synthesis, X‐Ray Structural Analysis, Supramolecular Properties, and Computational Study of New Aromatic Azo Compounds

ABSTRACT This article discusses the synthesis of aromatic azo compounds based on tert ‐butylbenzaldehyde. The synthesized compounds ( E )‐1‐(1‐(4‐( tert ‐butyl)phenyl)‐2,2‐dichlorovinyl)‐2‐(4‐chlorophenyl)diazene (I), ( E )‐1‐(2,2‐dibromo‐1‐(4‐( tert ‐butyl)phenyl)vinyl)‐2‐phenyldiazene (II) , and ( E )‐1‐(2,2‐dibromo‐1‐(4‐( tert ‐butyl)phenyl)vinyl)‐2‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)diazene (III) were characterized by 1 H and 13 C NMR spectroscopy. Moreover, the crystal structure of compounds was explored by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction (SC‐XRD) analysis. The diffraction analysis showed that the substitution on the aromatic ring affects the dihedral angle between rings, and a distinction between supramolecular assemblies is noticed. The inclination between aromatic rings is 79.96 (4)°, 78.76 (8)°, and 77.42 (7)° for compounds I–III , respectively. The supramolecular assembly of compounds I and II is stabilized by C–H⋅⋅⋅Cl and C–H⋅⋅⋅O bonding, respectively, whereas compound III has no conventional H‐bonding. The H⋯π interactions are observed at distances of 2.85 Å in compound I and 2.88 Å in compounds II and III , whereas the corresponding halogen⋯π distances are 3.6260 (7), 3.5660 (13), and 3.7934 (10) Å for compounds I , II , and III , respectively. The H⋯H contact predominates in the supramolecular assembly (34.4%, 44.2%, and 42.6% for I–III ), along with notable H⋯halogen and H⋯carbon interactions in all compounds. Furthermore, the crystal structure data have been employed to theoretically determine UV–visible, FT‐IR, NMR, highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO)–lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energies, frontier molecular orbitals, and molecular electrostatic potential through the DFT/B3LYP/6‐311+g(2d,p) level of theory. The HOMO–LUMO energy gaps are 5.75, 5.26, and 5.23 eV for compounds I–III , respectively, indicating that the bromo‐substituted derivative is the most reactive among them. The DFT results were found to be consistent with the experimental findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemistrySelect
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202503571
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Synthesis of Tetrazole Derivatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synthesis, X‐Ray Structural Analysis, Supramolecular Properties, and Computational Study of New Aromatic Azo Compounds

Shanawer Niaz, Namiq Q. Shikhaliyev, Khurram Shahzad Munawar, N. A. Grigoryeva et al.
1 citations
ChemistrySelect
Synthesis of Tetrazole Derivatives
0.94
article

Synthesis, X‐Ray Structural Analysis, Supramolecular Properties, and Computational Study of New Aromatic Azo Compounds

Shanawer Niaz, Namiq Q. Shikhaliyev, Khurram Shahzad Munawar, N. A. Grigoryeva, A.A. Niyazova, Afsun Sujayev, Muhammad Ashfaq, D.B. Тagiyev, Shahnaz I. Gahramanova, Gulnar T. Atakishiyeva, A. Qajar, Muhammad Tahir, Abel M. Maharramov, Jabrayil I. Mirzai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article discusses the synthesis of aromatic azo compounds based on tert ‐butylbenzaldehyde. The synthesized compounds ( E )‐1‐(1‐(4‐( tert ‐butyl)phenyl)‐2,2‐dichlorovinyl)‐2‐(4‐chlorophenyl)diazene (I), ( E )‐1‐(2,2‐dibromo‐1‐(4‐( tert ‐butyl)phenyl)vinyl)‐2‐phenyldiazene (II) , and ( E )‐1‐(2,2‐dibromo‐1‐(4‐( tert ‐butyl)phenyl)vinyl)‐2‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)diazene (III) were characterized by 1 H and 13 C NMR spectroscopy. Moreover, the crystal structure of compounds was explored by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction (SC‐XRD) analysis. The diffraction analysis showed that the substitution on the aromatic ring affects the dihedral angle between rings, and a distinction between supramolecular assemblies is noticed. The inclination between aromatic rings is 79.96 (4)°, 78.76 (8)°, and 77.42 (7)° for compounds I–III , respectively. The supramolecular assembly of compounds I and II is stabilized by C–H⋅⋅⋅Cl and C–H⋅⋅⋅O bonding, respectively, whereas compound III has no conventional H‐bonding. The H⋯π interactions are observed at distances of 2.85 Å in compound I and 2.88 Å in compounds II and III , whereas the corresponding halogen⋯π distances are 3.6260 (7), 3.5660 (13), and 3.7934 (10) Å for compounds I , II , and III , respectively. The H⋯H contact predominates in the supramolecular assembly (34.4%, 44.2%, and 42.6% for I–III ), along with notable H⋯halogen and H⋯carbon interactions in all compounds. Furthermore, the crystal structure data have been employed to theoretically determine UV–visible, FT‐IR, NMR, highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO)–lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energies, frontier molecular orbitals, and molecular electrostatic potential through the DFT/B3LYP/6‐311+g(2d,p) level of theory. The HOMO–LUMO energy gaps are 5.75, 5.26, and 5.23 eV for compounds I–III , respectively, indicating that the bromo‐substituted derivative is the most reactive among them. The DFT results were found to be consistent with the experimental findings.

ChemistrySelectVol. 10(46)
University of Sargodha (PK), Baku State University (AZ), Namal University (PK), Azerbaijan State University of Economics (AZ), Institute of Geography Named after Academician Hasan Aliyev (AZ), Panca Bhakti University (ID), Neft Kimya Prosesləri Institutu (AZ), Baku Engineering University (AZ), University of Mianwali
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Synthesis of Tetrazole Derivatives
0.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.