Digital Rights, AI, and the Law: International Perspectives on Saudi Arabia’s Legal Framework and International Experience

Background: This research analyses the global evolution of digital rights and AI governance and examines the implications for Saudi Arabia's legal framework. As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly embedded in everyday life, there is an urgent need to assess its impact on fundamental human rights, particularly given the absence of a global consensus on the definition and scope of "digital human rights." The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's (KSA) Vision 2030 initiative presents a unique opportunity to develop AI governance frameworks that align with international standards while reflecting local cultural values and Islamic ethical principles. Methods: This study employs a qualitative analytical approach to examine Saudi Arabia's current legal framework governing AI and digital human rights. The methodology involves a comprehensive statutory analysis of Saudi Arabian legislation, particularly the Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL) and the Saudi Data and AI Authority (SDAIA) 's ethical guidelines, in comparison to international legal instruments, including UNESCO's AI Ethics Recommendation, the EU AI Act, and OECD guidelines. The research evaluates alignment with international standards and effectiveness in addressing emerging digital rights challenges in the AI era. Results and conclusions: The research reveals that while Saudi Arabia has made notable progress through the PDPL and SDAIA frameworks, significant regulatory gaps persist. The PDPL exhibits limitations in addressing contemporary AI challenges, including algorithmic accountability, bias mitigation, and comprehensive data protection in AI contexts. The study identifies critical deficiencies, including overly broad exceptions to consent requirements, insufficient provisions for algorithmic transparency, and fragmented regulatory oversight. Recommendations include establishing specialised oversight bodies, developing ethical frameworks tailored to the Saudi context, and increasing the involvement of experts in decisions related to AI governance. This paper contributes by offering a comparative evaluation of Saudi Arabia’s digital rights framework against leading international instruments, highlighting reforms necessary for culturally grounded and globally aligned governance.

Publication Details

Journal
Access to Justice in Eastern Europe
Published
2025-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33327/ajee-18-8.s-a000154
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Rights, AI, and the Law: International Perspectives on Saudi Arabia’s Legal Framework and International Experience

Access to Justice in Eastern Europe
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Digital Rights, AI, and the Law: International Perspectives on Saudi Arabia’s Legal Framework and International Experience

article en

Abstract

Background: This research analyses the global evolution of digital rights and AI governance and examines the implications for Saudi Arabia's legal framework. As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly embedded in everyday life, there is an urgent need to assess its impact on fundamental human rights, particularly given the absence of a global consensus on the definition and scope of "digital human rights." The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's (KSA) Vision 2030 initiative presents a unique opportunity to develop AI governance frameworks that align with international standards while reflecting local cultural values and Islamic ethical principles. Methods: This study employs a qualitative analytical approach to examine Saudi Arabia's current legal framework governing AI and digital human rights. The methodology involves a comprehensive statutory analysis of Saudi Arabian legislation, particularly the Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL) and the Saudi Data and AI Authority (SDAIA) 's ethical guidelines, in comparison to international legal instruments, including UNESCO's AI Ethics Recommendation, the EU AI Act, and OECD guidelines. The research evaluates alignment with international standards and effectiveness in addressing emerging digital rights challenges in the AI era. Results and conclusions: The research reveals that while Saudi Arabia has made notable progress through the PDPL and SDAIA frameworks, significant regulatory gaps persist. The PDPL exhibits limitations in addressing contemporary AI challenges, including algorithmic accountability, bias mitigation, and comprehensive data protection in AI contexts. The study identifies critical deficiencies, including overly broad exceptions to consent requirements, insufficient provisions for algorithmic transparency, and fragmented regulatory oversight. Recommendations include establishing specialised oversight bodies, developing ethical frameworks tailored to the Saudi context, and increasing the involvement of experts in decisions related to AI governance. This paper contributes by offering a comparative evaluation of Saudi Arabia’s digital rights framework against leading international instruments, highlighting reforms necessary for culturally grounded and globally aligned governance.

Access to Justice in Eastern Europe(Special)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.