Evaluation of AI for prostate cancer detection in biparametric-MRI screening population data

Question Does an AI system trained in a screening cohort perform as well as radiologists? Findings An AI trained on screening data achieved an AUROC of 0.83 (95% CI 0.73-0.92) with lower specificity at the same sensitivity levels as radiologists. Clinical relevance An AI system trained in a screening population has lower specificity than radiologists using PI-RADS v2.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Radiology
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-12198-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of AI for prostate cancer detection in biparametric-MRI screening population data

Stephan E. Maier, Stefan Kuczera, Jonas Wallström, Fredrik Langkilde et al.
1 citations
European Radiology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Evaluation of AI for prostate cancer detection in biparametric-MRI screening population data

Stephan E. Maier, Stefan Kuczera, Jonas Wallström, Fredrik Langkilde, Magnus Gren
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Question Does an AI system trained in a screening cohort perform as well as radiologists? Findings An AI trained on screening data achieved an AUROC of 0.83 (95% CI 0.73-0.92) with lower specificity at the same sensitivity levels as radiologists. Clinical relevance An AI system trained in a screening population has lower specificity than radiologists using PI-RADS v2.

European Radiology
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Cancerfonden, Vetenskapsrådet, Göteborgs Universitet, Sahlgrenska Akademin
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.