Generative artificial intelligence competency self-efficacy scale for teachers and researchers (GAICS-TR) in higher education

Abstract Academics’ generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) competency is crucial for addressing the transformations it brings to higher education. Existing digital/AI competency frameworks may indirectly cope with AI competency issues needed but often overlook the impact of GenAI technology on research and assessment. Most existing AI competency frameworks for teachers focus on K–12 education, which is not appropriate for higher education. Therefore, this study aims to develop and validate a scale designed to measure GenAI Competency Self-Efficacy for Teachers and Researchers (GAICS-TR) in higher education. The scale is based on our proposed framework driven by literature and includes four domains and nine dimensions. The domains are basic GenAI understanding, teaching with GenAI, research with GenAI, and professional engagement and GenAI. The participants were 787 academics from nine universities. We used confirmatory factor analysis and group comparisons to validate the scale. Personal factors such as gender and age showed no significant differences across the scale components. The findings contribute to policies and research targeting the integration of GenAI into educational practices, as well as teacher professional development in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computers in Education
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-025-00373-y
Primary Topic
Digital literacy in education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative artificial intelligence competency self-efficacy scale for teachers and researchers (GAICS-TR) in higher education

Xiaojing Weng, Wo Sang Wilson Cheng, Thomas K. F. Chiu, Hatice ÇİLSALAR SAGNAK et al.
Journal of Computers in Education
Digital literacy in education
article

Generative artificial intelligence competency self-efficacy scale for teachers and researchers (GAICS-TR) in higher education

Xiaojing Weng, Wo Sang Wilson Cheng, Thomas K. F. Chiu, Hatice ÇİLSALAR SAGNAK, Qi Xia, Yiming Yang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Academics’ generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) competency is crucial for addressing the transformations it brings to higher education. Existing digital/AI competency frameworks may indirectly cope with AI competency issues needed but often overlook the impact of GenAI technology on research and assessment. Most existing AI competency frameworks for teachers focus on K–12 education, which is not appropriate for higher education. Therefore, this study aims to develop and validate a scale designed to measure GenAI Competency Self-Efficacy for Teachers and Researchers (GAICS-TR) in higher education. The scale is based on our proposed framework driven by literature and includes four domains and nine dimensions. The domains are basic GenAI understanding, teaching with GenAI, research with GenAI, and professional engagement and GenAI. The participants were 787 academics from nine universities. We used confirmatory factor analysis and group comparisons to validate the scale. Personal factors such as gender and age showed no significant differences across the scale components. The findings contribute to policies and research targeting the integration of GenAI into educational practices, as well as teacher professional development in higher education.

Journal of Computers in Education
Zhejiang International Studies University (CN), University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi (TR), Education University of Hong Kong (HK), Metropolitan University (BD), Zhejiang University (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Digital literacy in education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.