Factors affecting chief executive officers’ managerial autonomy in municipally owned corporations: a qualitative study

The importance of managerial autonomy for organizational performance and accountability is increasingly acknowledged in municipally owned corporations (MOCs) operating within competitive environments. However, few studies have examined the factors enabling or restricting chief executive officers' (CEOs') managerial autonomy in companies reliant on local and central governments. Using the public agency autonomy perspective, we investigate the subjective perceptions of MOCs’ executives concerning three intertwined political and bureaucratic mechanisms. The results of our 18 semi-structured interviews with CEOs of such corporations in various Israeli municipal authorities identified three factors on the micro, meso and macro levels affecting their autonomy. These findings reveal a pattern whereby local political and bureaucratic actors try to engage in framed autonomy, in contrast to the administrative bureaucracy model of the central government that curtails the CEOs’ autonomy substantially. Consequently, this dynamic impedes MOCs from achieving their goals. This interplay of micro, meso and macro factors explains how tensions between local and central governments are reflected in the managerial operations of MOCs. Points for practitioners Leverage Supportive Political Relationships to Navigate Constraints: Building trust-based ties with supportive political actors can help mitigate regulatory burdens and enable more adaptive decision-making within bureaucratic constraints. Balance Board Governance with Managerial Discretion: Practitioners should remain alert to how political appointments may influence operations and develop strategies to preserve managerial discretion while maintaining accountability. Promote Two-Way Engagement with Central Authorities: Public executives should advocate for more reciprocal relationships with central agencies, encouraging support-oriented oversight that acknowledges on-the-ground realities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Administrative Sciences
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523251369314
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors affecting chief executive officers’ managerial autonomy in municipally owned corporations: a qualitative study

Anna Uster, Hedva Vinarski‐Peretz
International Review of Administrative Sciences
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Factors affecting chief executive officers’ managerial autonomy in municipally owned corporations: a qualitative study

Anna Uster, Hedva Vinarski‐Peretz
article en

Abstract

The importance of managerial autonomy for organizational performance and accountability is increasingly acknowledged in municipally owned corporations (MOCs) operating within competitive environments. However, few studies have examined the factors enabling or restricting chief executive officers' (CEOs') managerial autonomy in companies reliant on local and central governments. Using the public agency autonomy perspective, we investigate the subjective perceptions of MOCs’ executives concerning three intertwined political and bureaucratic mechanisms. The results of our 18 semi-structured interviews with CEOs of such corporations in various Israeli municipal authorities identified three factors on the micro, meso and macro levels affecting their autonomy. These findings reveal a pattern whereby local political and bureaucratic actors try to engage in framed autonomy, in contrast to the administrative bureaucracy model of the central government that curtails the CEOs’ autonomy substantially. Consequently, this dynamic impedes MOCs from achieving their goals. This interplay of micro, meso and macro factors explains how tensions between local and central governments are reflected in the managerial operations of MOCs. Points for practitioners Leverage Supportive Political Relationships to Navigate Constraints: Building trust-based ties with supportive political actors can help mitigate regulatory burdens and enable more adaptive decision-making within bureaucratic constraints. Balance Board Governance with Managerial Discretion: Practitioners should remain alert to how political appointments may influence operations and develop strategies to preserve managerial discretion while maintaining accountability. Promote Two-Way Engagement with Central Authorities: Public executives should advocate for more reciprocal relationships with central agencies, encouraging support-oriented oversight that acknowledges on-the-ground realities.

International Review of Administrative SciencesVol. 92(1)
The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Factors affecting chief executive officers’ managerial autonomy in municipally owned corporations: a qualitative study — Anna Uster, Hedva Vinarski‐Peretz · International Review of Administrative Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS