CONSIDERATION OF SOCIAL FACTORS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGULATORY DOCUMENTS FOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

The diversification of architectural forms and spaces in conditions of increased intensity of events leads to the search for new approaches and solutions, requires analysis and development of new techniques. The article considers the need for an integrated approach that takes into account regular monitoring and analysis of existing architectural solutions, as well as a flexible approach to the formation of regional features of regulatory documents. The urgency of the problem is related to the existing provision for determining the needs for architectural objects, which is based on statistical data and is uniform for vast territories. In turn, design relies on socio-functional factors, which, in conditions of political and economic imbalance, must have the qualities of flexibility, adaptability and plasticity in order to quickly respond to changing situations, which inevitably leads to the transformation of the environment and objects within it. However, compliance with current regulations does not reflect the true picture of existing deficits and surpluses. At the same time, some calculated indicators of regulatory documents have not changed for decades. The life cycle of a building is usually completed for the designer at the stage of commissioning the facility. Contractual obligations are also coming to an end. And, although the chief architect is responsible for the constructed building for life, internal and external changes cease to be a task for him to regularly monitor and analyze the decisions made. The lack of interest of designers in monitoring and analyzing the facilities they have built is understandable. They cannot affect changes when identical tasks occur. More precisely, they cannot do this promptly, since there are no principles for the formation of a flexible approach to the development of regulatory documents for the implementation of architectural design. The purpose of this article is to develop a scientific basis for determining the evaluation criteria that affect regulatory indicators in design, as well as the introduction of flexible indicators in regulatory documents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Belgorod State Technological University named after V G Shukhov
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34031/2071-7318-2025-10-12-62-72
Primary Topic
Real estate and construction management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CONSIDERATION OF SOCIAL FACTORS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGULATORY DOCUMENTS FOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

Olga Volichenko, Yu. V. Makunina
Bulletin of Belgorod State Technological University named after V G Shukhov
Real estate and construction management
article

CONSIDERATION OF SOCIAL FACTORS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGULATORY DOCUMENTS FOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

Olga Volichenko, Yu. V. Makunina
article en

Abstract

The diversification of architectural forms and spaces in conditions of increased intensity of events leads to the search for new approaches and solutions, requires analysis and development of new techniques. The article considers the need for an integrated approach that takes into account regular monitoring and analysis of existing architectural solutions, as well as a flexible approach to the formation of regional features of regulatory documents. The urgency of the problem is related to the existing provision for determining the needs for architectural objects, which is based on statistical data and is uniform for vast territories. In turn, design relies on socio-functional factors, which, in conditions of political and economic imbalance, must have the qualities of flexibility, adaptability and plasticity in order to quickly respond to changing situations, which inevitably leads to the transformation of the environment and objects within it. However, compliance with current regulations does not reflect the true picture of existing deficits and surpluses. At the same time, some calculated indicators of regulatory documents have not changed for decades. The life cycle of a building is usually completed for the designer at the stage of commissioning the facility. Contractual obligations are also coming to an end. And, although the chief architect is responsible for the constructed building for life, internal and external changes cease to be a task for him to regularly monitor and analyze the decisions made. The lack of interest of designers in monitoring and analyzing the facilities they have built is understandable. They cannot affect changes when identical tasks occur. More precisely, they cannot do this promptly, since there are no principles for the formation of a flexible approach to the development of regulatory documents for the implementation of architectural design. The purpose of this article is to develop a scientific basis for determining the evaluation criteria that affect regulatory indicators in design, as well as the introduction of flexible indicators in regulatory documents.

Bulletin of Belgorod State Technological University named after V G ShukhovVol. 10(12)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RU), School of Planning and Architecture Delhi (IN), Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Real estate and construction management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.