Boundary restructuring reshapes land use: The impact of administrative division adjustment on urban land use efficiency

Improving land use efficiency is a global consensus for sustainable urban transformation, but the powerful role of widely implemented administrative division adjustments remains insufficiently understood. Based on panel data from Chinese cities between 2003 and 2019, this study employs multi-period difference-in-differences and mediating effect models to analyze how county-level administrative division adjustments (cADC) affect urban land use efficiency (ULUE). Theoretically, cADC negatively influences ULUE by redrawing boundaries to enable urban expansion, while simultaneously undermining spatial continuity and functional coherence. The realignment of intergovernmental authority and fiscal relationships further exacerbates interjurisdictional competition for land resources and distorts land use planning, thereby diminishing social equity and cross-regional environmental governance. These institutional changes at the macro level manifest as micro-level inefficiencies in land use through resource allocation mechanisms and market processes. Empirically, cADC reduces ULUE by approximately 12%, with the strongest negative effects observed in county-to-district conversions and medium-sized cities. Although cADC stimulates labor and capital inputs, these fail to improve ULUE. Moreover, cADC significantly depresses land marketization, exacerbating efficiency losses. These findings highlight the need to carefully assess the spatial and institutional consequences of administrative restructuring. Policymakers should strengthen cross-jurisdictional coordination, harmonize public interventions with market forces, and emphasize land use efficiency rather than areal expansion to advance intensive and sustainable urban development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions in Planning and Urban Research
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27541223251399931
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Boundary restructuring reshapes land use: The impact of administrative division adjustment on urban land use efficiency

Xuan Liu, Miao Zhang, Yuzhen Zhang
Transactions in Planning and Urban Research
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Boundary restructuring reshapes land use: The impact of administrative division adjustment on urban land use efficiency

Xuan Liu, Miao Zhang, Yuzhen Zhang
article en

Abstract

Improving land use efficiency is a global consensus for sustainable urban transformation, but the powerful role of widely implemented administrative division adjustments remains insufficiently understood. Based on panel data from Chinese cities between 2003 and 2019, this study employs multi-period difference-in-differences and mediating effect models to analyze how county-level administrative division adjustments (cADC) affect urban land use efficiency (ULUE). Theoretically, cADC negatively influences ULUE by redrawing boundaries to enable urban expansion, while simultaneously undermining spatial continuity and functional coherence. The realignment of intergovernmental authority and fiscal relationships further exacerbates interjurisdictional competition for land resources and distorts land use planning, thereby diminishing social equity and cross-regional environmental governance. These institutional changes at the macro level manifest as micro-level inefficiencies in land use through resource allocation mechanisms and market processes. Empirically, cADC reduces ULUE by approximately 12%, with the strongest negative effects observed in county-to-district conversions and medium-sized cities. Although cADC stimulates labor and capital inputs, these fail to improve ULUE. Moreover, cADC significantly depresses land marketization, exacerbating efficiency losses. These findings highlight the need to carefully assess the spatial and institutional consequences of administrative restructuring. Policymakers should strengthen cross-jurisdictional coordination, harmonize public interventions with market forces, and emphasize land use efficiency rather than areal expansion to advance intensive and sustainable urban development.

Transactions in Planning and Urban ResearchVol. 4(3-4)
Tianjin University of Finance and Economics (CN), Shandong Management University (CN), China Land Surveying and Planning Institute (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.