Empirical therapy versus tailored therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection? A systematic review

The global decline in the efficacy of empirical treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication driven largely by rising antibiotic resistance has prompted increasing interest in tailored therapeutic approaches. Tailored therapy, guided by antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), offers a theoretically superior strategy by enabling selection of effective, resistance-informed regimens. However, the comparative effectiveness of tailored versus empirical therapy remains uncertain across different clinical contexts and geographic regions. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL was performed to identify studies published inception to August 2025 that directly compared empirical and AST-guided tailored therapy for H. pylori eradication. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational comparative studies reporting intention-to-treat or per-protocol eradication rates. Study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessments (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale) were performed independently by two reviewers. Fifty-five studies comprising approximately 14,940 patients were included. Tailored therapy demonstrated higher eradication rates in 85% of first-line studies, with PCR-guided regimens achieving the most consistent success. In rescue settings, tailored therapy showed variable outcomes, with several studies reporting comparable efficacy to empirical quadruple therapy. Overall, tailored regimens were more effective in high-resistance settings and when guided by timely and accurate AST. The summarized evidence suggests that tailored therapy, guided by antimicrobial susceptibility testing, often achieves higher H. pylori eradication rates than empirical therapy, especially as a first-line approach. However, the heterogeneity in study design and outcomes necessitates careful consideration when applying these findings. Tailored therapy appears to be a valuable strategy to optimize H. pylori eradication, potentially combating rising antibiotic resistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-12289-0
Primary Topic
Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empirical therapy versus tailored therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection? A systematic review

Masoud Keikha, Hamidreza Zivarifar
BMC Infectious Diseases
Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
article

Empirical therapy versus tailored therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection? A systematic review

Masoud Keikha, Hamidreza Zivarifar
article en

Abstract

The global decline in the efficacy of empirical treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication driven largely by rising antibiotic resistance has prompted increasing interest in tailored therapeutic approaches. Tailored therapy, guided by antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), offers a theoretically superior strategy by enabling selection of effective, resistance-informed regimens. However, the comparative effectiveness of tailored versus empirical therapy remains uncertain across different clinical contexts and geographic regions. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL was performed to identify studies published inception to August 2025 that directly compared empirical and AST-guided tailored therapy for H. pylori eradication. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational comparative studies reporting intention-to-treat or per-protocol eradication rates. Study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessments (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale) were performed independently by two reviewers. Fifty-five studies comprising approximately 14,940 patients were included. Tailored therapy demonstrated higher eradication rates in 85% of first-line studies, with PCR-guided regimens achieving the most consistent success. In rescue settings, tailored therapy showed variable outcomes, with several studies reporting comparable efficacy to empirical quadruple therapy. Overall, tailored regimens were more effective in high-resistance settings and when guided by timely and accurate AST. The summarized evidence suggests that tailored therapy, guided by antimicrobial susceptibility testing, often achieves higher H. pylori eradication rates than empirical therapy, especially as a first-line approach. However, the heterogeneity in study design and outcomes necessitates careful consideration when applying these findings. Tailored therapy appears to be a valuable strategy to optimize H. pylori eradication, potentially combating rising antibiotic resistance.

BMC Infectious DiseasesVol. 26(1)
Zahedan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Empirical therapy versus tailored therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection? A systematic review — Masoud Keikha, Hamidreza Zivarifar · BMC Infectious Diseases (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS