Rapid integration of speaker accent during morphosyntactic processing

Listeners take multiple sources of information into account when processing spoken language. This includes the speaker's accent, which affects the on-line processing of many aspects of language, including morphosyntax. This study investigated listeners' neural responses to subject-verb agreement errors in native vs. Mandarin-accented English. The error types differed in typicality: Errors of omission, but not errors of commission, are frequently produced by Mandarin-accented English speakers. Different error types elicited different neural responses in native vs. foreign-accented speech. Errors of omission elicited a P600 in native speech and no response in foreign-accented speech, while errors of commission elicited an N400 in native speech and a sustained negativity, beginning before the overt violation, in foreign-accented speech. This illustrates the influence of speaker accent on morphosyntactic processing and suggests that, while listeners are sensitive to error typicality, factors such as the perceptual salience of the violation may also affect neural responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain and Language
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2025.105673
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rapid integration of speaker accent during morphosyntactic processing

Elaine Schmidt, Rebecca Holt, C Kung, Katherine Demuth
Brain and Language
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

Rapid integration of speaker accent during morphosyntactic processing

Elaine Schmidt, Rebecca Holt, C Kung, Katherine Demuth
article en

Abstract

Listeners take multiple sources of information into account when processing spoken language. This includes the speaker's accent, which affects the on-line processing of many aspects of language, including morphosyntax. This study investigated listeners' neural responses to subject-verb agreement errors in native vs. Mandarin-accented English. The error types differed in typicality: Errors of omission, but not errors of commission, are frequently produced by Mandarin-accented English speakers. Different error types elicited different neural responses in native vs. foreign-accented speech. Errors of omission elicited a P600 in native speech and no response in foreign-accented speech, while errors of commission elicited an N400 in native speech and a sustained negativity, beginning before the overt violation, in foreign-accented speech. This illustrates the influence of speaker accent on morphosyntactic processing and suggests that, while listeners are sensitive to error typicality, factors such as the perceptual salience of the violation may also affect neural responses.

Brain and LanguageVol. 273
University of Cambridge (GB), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rapid integration of speaker accent during morphosyntactic processing — Elaine Schmidt, Rebecca Holt, et al. · Brain and Language (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS