Safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted versus manual percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis
R-PCI offers procedural advantages, particularly in reducing fluoroscopy time and contrast use, while demonstrating comparable safety and efficacy to M-PCI. Further, high-quality trials are needed to clarify its long-term clinical impact.
Authors
- Rendra Mahardhika Putra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9231-3268)
- Konstantinos Bermpeis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3732-196X)
- Roy Novri Ramadhan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6100-9015)
- Derren David Christian Homenta Rampengan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5482-0613)
- Chaq El Chaq Zamzam Multazam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1965-8788)
- Mochamad Yusuf Alsagaff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2194-6850)
- Sebastian Emmanuel Willyanto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8039-0574)
- Ali Mustofa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4335-6117)
- Melissa Valentina Ariyanto
- Jihaan Farahiyah
Institutions
- University of Brawijaya (ID)
- Universitas Airlangga (ID)
- AHEPA University Hospital (GR)
- Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital (BE)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Sam Ratulangi University (ID)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Systematic Reviews
- Published
- 2025-12-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02998-7
- Primary Topic
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00